More broadcast journalism

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM
Tue May 4 00:34:50 UTC 2010 

Or "stylistically tendentious"?

JL

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com>wrote:

> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject:      Re: More broadcast journalism
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The noun that comes to mind is "slanting," though there may be something a
> bit more precise.
>
> How about "unfairly implicative" ?
>
> JL
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
>
> > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> > -----------------------
> > Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
> > Subject:      Re: More broadcast journalism
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I've just read an historian who does the same thing.  What is (are)
> > the best adjective(s) to describe this kind of writing and
> > speech?  (I want serious, scholarly ones, not the snarky.)
> >
> > Joel
> >
> > At 5/3/2010 05:47 PM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
> > >It took two by-lined AP journalists to write the following [
> > >
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100503/ap_on_re_us/us_times_square_car_bomb
> > ]:
> > >
> > >"The surveillance video, made public late Sunday, shows the man slipping
> > >down Shubert Alley and taking off his shirt, revealing another
> underneath.
> > >In the same clip, [he] looks back in the direction of the smoking
> vehicle
> > >and furtively puts the first shirt in a bag."
> > >
> > >I've watched the video several times, and simple accuracy demands
> > >"...walking down Shubert Alley" and "looks behind him and places the
> first
> > >shirt in the bag."
> > >
> > >At least the article cites Mayor Bloomberg (for balance):  "'He may or
> may
> > >not have been involved,' he said, adding it was a hot day and he might
> > >simply have been trying to cool off."
> > >
> > >Whether or not the guy turns out to have been involved, the only
> possible
> > >reason to write "slipping," "furtively," and "in the direction of the
> > >smoking vehicle" is to make his actions - in this clip -  seem
> especially
> > >suspicious.
> > >
> > >JL
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Jonathan Lighter
> > ><wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > > > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> > > > -----------------------
> > > > Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > > > Poster:       Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM>
> > > > Subject:      Re: OT: More broadcast journalism
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Could there be more than one at large?  I remember an important
> > _X-Files_
> > > > episode involving an evil-doer who could "bilocate," i.e., be in two
> > > > different places at the same time. And he wasn't even the Antichrist.
> > > >
> > > > Use of disguise would help too.
> > > >
> > > > Food for thought.
> > > >
> > > > JL
> > > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Wilson Gray <hwgray at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> > > > > -----------------------
> > > > > Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > > > > Poster:       Wilson Gray <hwgray at GMAIL.COM>
> > > > > Subject:      Re: OT: More broadcast journalism
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
> > > > ------
> > > > >
> > > > > But believers would accept as fact that he *isn't* innocent and,
> even
> > > > > if he were, they would claim that he could still *voluntarily* have
> > > > > accepted the role of the Antichrist's beast of burden.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Wilson
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> > > > > -----------------------
> > > > > > Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > > > > > Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
> > > > > > Subject:      Re: OT: More broadcast journalism
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
> > > > ------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 5/3/2010 11:05 AM, Mullins, Bill AMRDEC wrote:
> > > > > >> > Behalf Of Jonathan Lighter
> > > > > >> > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:53 AM
> > > > > >> > To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: OT: More broadcast journalism
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > And it's something else again for an American to
> > > > > >> > suspect that the President of the United States, duly elected
> by
> > > > ten=
> > > > s
> > > > > >>of
> > > > > >> > millions of fellow citizens and vetted by an established
> > national
> > > > > >>party is really
> > > > > >> > [the Antichrist].
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>True.  But on the other hand, if you were the Antichrist,
> wouldn't
> > you
> > > > > >>incarnate yourself as a the President, use your Antichrist powers
> > to
> > > > ge=
> > > > t
> > > > > >>millions of people to vote for you, and put your Antichrist
> buddies
> > in
> > > > > >>power in an established national party to vet you?  This seems a
> > lot
> > > > > >>more likely than Antichristing at McDonald's by carrying the
> trash
> > to
> > > > > >>the dumpster.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wasn't that theory discredited in 1692, when it was finally
> > > > > > determined (after the trials were halted) that the Antichrist
> could
> > > > > > not take the form of an innocent person without that person's
> > > > > cooperation?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Joel
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -Wilson
> > > > > =96=96=96
> > > > > All say, "How hard it is that we have to die!"=96=96a strange
> > complaint
> > > > t=
> > > > o
> > > > > come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
> > > > > =96Mark Twain
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >  The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --=20
> > > > "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the
> > truth."
> > > >
> > > >  ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >"If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the
> > truth."
> > >
> > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >
> >  ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the
> truth."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>



--
"If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

More information about the Ads-l mailing list