firm believer that
Neal Whitman
nwhitman at AMERITECH.NET
Thu Dec 22 17:10:58 UTC 2011
My blog post response to the thread that began at http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ADS-L;f9bd41fb.1109C, with Benjamin Barrett's query:
A non-native speaker of English asks me whether the following is grammatical:
"I'm a firm believer that anyone can have a breakthrough right in her own backyard."
It's from an essay of Oprah in the current issue of O Magazine.
It took me about five reads before I spotted anything possibly amiss, but "a firm believer that." definitely appears wrong now that I see it.
I think this must come from a cross of "I'm a firm believer in the idea that." and "I firmly believe that."
Is that correct?
Benjamin Barrett
Seattle, WA
http://literalminded.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/im-a-believer-that/
My tentative conclusion is that prepositional phrase complements (but not adjuncts) are OK with agent nominalizations ("listener to the program", *"washer with soap"); infinitival complements are not (*"attempter to VP"); and clausal complements are, at least with some verbs (many COCA attestations of "believer(s) that" and "indicator that").
Neal Whitman
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list