Heard on Futurama:
ronbutters at AOL.COM
ronbutters at AOL.COM
Sat Jun 18 01:36:18 UTC 2011
Yes, and the weeney-ding-diddle is surely microscopic.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 17, 2011, at 7:51 PM, Laurence Horn <laurence.horn at YALE.EDU> wrote:
> At 5:01 PM -0400 6/17/11, Wilson Gray wrote:
>> Wang-dang-doodle "penis" (source of wang "id."?) oddly "corrected" to
>> _wing_-dang-doodle.
>>
>> WTF?
>
> If I remember my Intro to Sound Symbolism correctly, a
> wing-dang-doodle might suggest a smaller item than the
> wang-dang-doodle. Perhaps a wing-ding-doodle would be smaller still.
> Of course in the future, who can say?
>
> LH
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list