ADS-L Digest - 25 Mar 2011 to 26 Mar 2011 (#2011-86)

[ronbutters at AOL.COM]

This seems decidedly off topic, but insofar as it impacts methodology of establishment of likelihood of scientific fact, I think I have to go with Napoleon over Jesus. Of course, one can believe in both.
------Original Message------
From: Your Name
Sender: ADS-L
To: ADS-L
ReplyTo: ADS-L
Subject: Re: [ADS-L] ADS-L Digest - 25 Mar 2011 to 26 Mar 2011 (#2011-86)
Sent: Mar 27, 2011 3:42 PM

In a message dated 3/27/2011 12:00:39 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
LISTSERV at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU writes:

After  all,
far more people appear to know what Jesus would do and,  considering
that whether He [thank you, Jesuit Fathers!] even existed is  only a
matter of faith ...


There's more evidence for not only the existence of Jesus, but His bodily
resurrection, than there is for the existence of Napoleon.   Jus'sayin.


Rosemarie

I don’t know the key to success, but the  key to failure is to trying to
please everybody. -- Bill  Cosby

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org