ADS-L Digest - 25 Mar 2011 to 26 Mar 2011 (#2011-86)

[Joel S. Berson]

At 3/27/2011 04:49 PM, ronbutters at AOL.COM wrote:
>This seems decidedly off topic,

and endemically evangelical of Your Name <ROSESKES at AOL.COM>, who has
written here about nothing else recently.

Joel

>but insofar as it impacts methodology of establishment of likelihood
>of scientific fact, I think I have to go with Napoleon over Jesus.
>Of course, one can believe in both.
>------Original Message------
>From: Your Name
>Sender: ADS-L
>To: ADS-L
>ReplyTo: ADS-L
>Subject: Re: [ADS-L] ADS-L Digest - 25 Mar 2011 to 26 Mar 2011 (#2011-86)
>Sent: Mar 27, 2011 3:42 PM
>
>In a message dated 3/27/2011 12:00:39 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>LISTSERV at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU writes:
>
>After  all,
>far more people appear to know what Jesus would do and,  considering
>that whether He [thank you, Jesuit Fathers!] even existed is  only a
>matter of faith ...
>
>
>There's more evidence for not only the existence of Jesus, but His bodily
>resurrection, than there is for the existence of Napoleon.   Jus'sayin.
>
>
>Rosemarie
>
>I don't know the key to success, but the  key to failure is to trying to
>please everybody. -- Bill  Cosby
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
>
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org