Writers now obselete?

[Benjamin Barrett]

See also the thread from last month on the same topic, but different article, titled "Sports writers to be replaced by 'bots".

There doesn't seem to be a way to search for messages by number, but they are 112866, 112868, 112869 and 112922.

It seems they have found a way to make this work commercially.

Benjamin Barrett
Seattle, WA

On Oct 26, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Eric Nielsen wrote:

>
> Sorry, that should be "obsolete". I bet a machine wouldn't make that
> mistake.
>
> Eric
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Eric Nielsen <ericbarnak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This could be an easy way to keep up with all one's social correspondence,
>> but if my friends used the same kind of service--- what's the point. It
>> would only be one program talking to another: Maybe eventually that will be
>> the point.
>>
>>
>> http://semanticweb.com/narrative-science-has-computers-writing-articles_b23085
>>
>> Eric
>>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org