No "damage"?

[Tom Zurinskas]

Right, unless they think of discrimination as a kind of payback (collateral) on a loan that they will get coming right back at them.  Pretty insecure security.  Id say the receivers should Welsh on that loan because default is on the lenders.


Tom Zurinskas, first Ct 20 yrs, then Tn 3, NJ 33, Fl 9.
Learn the alphabet and sounds of US English at justpaste.it/ayk




>
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Wilson Gray <hwgray at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject: No "damage"?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Possible discriminatory effects on non-speakers of Welsh are
> justified as acceptable collateral."
>
> Should be "collateral _damage__," right?
>
> Or maybe I've missed the point. The context is a discussion - in
> English, of course! - of ways and means to increase the "pro-active,"
> so to speak, use of Welsh among ethnic Welsh in Wales.
>
> --
> -Wilson
> -----
> All say, "How hard it is that we have to die!"---a strange complaint
> to come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
> -Mark Twain
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org