Maddened by Mad Men
ronbutters at AOL.COM
ronbutters at AOL.COM
Wed Sep 21 01:55:44 UTC 2011
This is what is called an "idiom." It does not have to make literal sense, any more than "kick the bucket does." Or, for that matter, "Shut up."
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 20, 2011, at 5:43 PM, "Hunter, Lynne R CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-PACIFIC, 71700"<lynne.hunter at NAVY.MIL> wrote:
> I understand what you're saying, but it seems to me (without having
> carefully thought this out) that "holding down" is generally used to
> mean something like "to retain [something]" or "keep [something] in
> place," so in the case under scrutiny, "holding down the fort" would
> seem to suggest just holding the fort in place or keeping it intact in a
> general sort of way, whereas "holding the fort" suggests "holding ground
> [against an adversary]," and is linked (in my mind, anyway) to "holding
> off invaders," "holding back an onslaught," "holding out against the
> enemy," a castle "stronghold," and so forth. In other words, "hold the
> fort" (to me) implies the idea of defending against an aggressor.
> Thoughts?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: American Dialect Society [mailto:ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf
> Of Shapiro, Fred
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 13:57
> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Maddened by Mad Men
>
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Poster: "Shapiro, Fred" <fred.shapiro at YALE.EDU>
> Subject: Re: Maddened by Mad Men
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
> Isn't this just an example of the phrasal verb "to hold down,"
> documented by the OED back to 1891 and by now well established in
> phrases such as "to hold down a job"?
>
> Fred
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:46 PM
> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Maddened by Mad Men
>
> Recent annoyance from _Mad Men_: "Miss Holloway can hold down the fort."
> "Hold _down_ the fort" is irritating enough in the present day (at least
> to my particular ear) without its being ascribed to 1962 speakers. (The
> phrase conjures up a flighty outpost flimsily moored to some low-gravity
> planet.)
>
> Lynne Hunter
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list