Mutt
Baker, John
JBAKER at STRADLEY.COM
Tue Aug 14 12:35:02 UTC 2012
I think it's well-established that the beliefs of early knowledgeable users of a new term are valuable evidence, although of course they may be wrong.
It's probably more relevant that this shows that "mutt" was established usage by trainers of setters and pointers. I suspect this undercuts the suggested derivation from "mutton dog," although I would certainly be open to further insights on this.
John Baker
-----Original Message-----
From: American Dialect Society [mailto:ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Wilson Gray
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 5:22 PM
To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mutt
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Baker, John <JBAKER at stradley.com> quoted:
> This word is _probably_ a corruption of mutton or muttonhead
and wrote:
> it ... provides early support for the derivation from "muttonhead."
How does "probably" provide any kind of support?
--
-Wilson
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list