serendipidous --> freeholder

[Joel S. Berson]

At 2/8/2012 03:14 PM, Dan Goncharoff wrote:
>This website might help explain its meaning:
>http://www.co.morris.nj.us/freeholders/freeholderjob.asp
>
>I believe the article is conflating 'freeholder' and 'Chosen Freeholder'

Definitely.   (The Morris County page has a useful explanation.)  The
"Board of Chosen Freeholders" is what one is elected to.  In
Massachusetts the corresponding body for towns was the "Board of
Selectmen" (and still is, in many towns).  And, presumably, today one
does not have to be a "freeholder" to be elected to the Board, just a
resident of the county.

>This would all be mush more confusing if it were happening in the town
>of Freehold, NJ.
>
>DanG

My thanks to someone who apparently watches "The Housewives of New
Jersey".  :-)

Joel

>On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
> > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> > Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
> > Subject:      Re: serendipidous --> freeholder
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I'm more interested in "freeholder" below.  In my experience (17th
> > and 18th centuries), a freeholder was someone who owned real property
> > (in "freehold estate").  But the below passage seems to attach some
> > meaning to "freeholder" that eludes me.  Being a freeholder seems
> > very unrelated to the reason for removal, which I gather is having
> > been placed in the wrong position (although it's not clear to me
> > whether the passage means on on the ballot for or in the count of the
> > final election).
> >
> > Being a freeholder used to qualify one to vote and hold office, but
> > it's hard for me to believe that there is such a real property
> > requirement in any county in NJ today.  (In any case, that still
> > seems unrelated to the reason for removal.)
> >
> > But perhaps I'm wrong -- after all, there is "Housewives of New Jersey".
> >
> > Joel
> >
> > At 2/8/2012 03:54 AM, Victor Steinbok wrote:
> >>I see this as an odd use of serendipidous--others might disagree. But
> >>let me get to the point.
> >>
> >>A NJ Appeals Court has removed a "freeholder" from the county board
> >>because of a previous judicial screwup that placed her above another
> >>Republican candidate who had beaten her in the primary (albeit by a
> >>small margin). The county is heavily Republican, so the presumption has
> >>been all along that the winner of the primary would win the election
> >>(she did). So now that she's been removed, there will have to be a
> >>nominating convention to place someone in her office, then another
> >>primary and another general election in November, in order to fill the
> >>remainder of her term. Her response:
> >>
> >>http://goo.gl/6K3GY
> >>>"One thing I've learned is that politics is a very serendipitous
> >>>business," Nordstrom said. "My understanding right now is that I'm not
> >>>a freeholder. You have to take it in stride. I'm taking it one step at
> >>>a time."
> >>
> >>Why "serendipitous"? How is this a happy coincidence? Did she simply
> >>mean "unexpected"? Then why use the big words?
> >>
> >>     VS-)

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org