"Look less-powerful weapons"

[Randy Alexander]

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Arnold Zwicky <zwicky at stanford.edu> wrote:

> no, that wasn't what i was saying. i was saying that "look" 'look to be
> be' + predicative other than AdjP was mostly BrE, not that "look to be" was.
>

Sorry I didn't understand that clearly.

If I now understand you correctly, you're saying that "[look] to be +
{predicative that's not an AdjP}" is mostly BrE.  But while "[look]" is
restricted in AmE to be followed only by predicative complements in the
form of AdjPs, "[look] to be" has no such restriction in AmE, because the
predicative complements are following [be], and not [look], so we can have
NPs, PPs, AdjPs, and a few different kinds of complement clauses.

--
Randy Alexander
Xiamen, China
Blogs:
Manchu studies: http://www.sinoglot.com/manchu
Chinese characters: http://www.sinoglot.com/yuwen
Language in China (group blog): http://www.sinoglot.com/blog

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org