a "brokered convention"

[Joel S. Berson]

At 3/18/2012 02:29 PM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
>That ain't brokering, that's commenting.

Attempted brokering (which is what I think commentators on her
comment commented) is nearly as criminal as actual brokering.  (Just
substitute "breaking in" for "brokering".)

Joel


>JL
>
>On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
>
> > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> > -----------------------
> > Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
> > Subject:      Re: a "brokered convention"
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Didn't Barbara Bush broker when she referred to the Republican
> > presidential campaign as the worst she'd sever seen?   One  could
> > interpret that, and I think some have, as a request for the other
> > candidates to withdraw in favor of Romney so there wouldn't be an
> > open convention.  Remember, this is the Republicans we're talking
> > about -- why be open when you can go into a smoke-filled room?
> >
> > Joel
> >
> > At 3/18/2012 01:27 PM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
> > >Of course, it's conceivable that an "open convention" might, after many
> > >ballots, become a "brokered convention," with Gov. Palin or Donald Trump
> > or
> > >Grover Norquist acting as kingmaker, but that's far less likely than an
> > >"open convention."
> > >
> > >More exciting, too, and I suppose that explains it.
> > >
> > >JL
> > >
> > >On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Victor Steinbok <aardvark66 at gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> > > > -----------------------
> > > > Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > > > Poster:       Victor Steinbok <aardvark66 at GMAIL.COM>
> > > > Subject:      Re: a "brokered convention"
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > They might go back to "open convention" if we start calling it the
> > > > "brokeback convention".
> > > >
> > > >     VS-)
> > > >
> > > > On 3/18/2012 11:40 AM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
> > > > > The news world is rife with yak about the possibility of a "brokered
> > > > > convention" if no Republican candidate wins a majority of delegates
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > primaries.
> > > > >
> > > > > After a few days of this, some journalists had the decency to point
> > out
> > > > > that they don't mean a "brokered" convention, in which some kingmaker
> > > > > wangles his preferred candidate into the catbird seat; they mean an
> > > > "open"
> > > > > convention with everybody wheeling and dealing for himself.  (I don't
> > > > know
> > > > > the last time an actual "brokered convention" occurred.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Nevertheless, the preferred term for "open convention" still seems
> > to be
> > > > > "brokered convention."
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully it will fade away. But it seems worth noting.
> > > > >
> > > > > JL
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >"If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the
> > truth."
> > >
> > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> >
>
>
>
>--
>"If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org