Somewhat OT: pre-existing

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM
Sun Oct 28 16:39:40 UTC 2012


"Pre-existing" doesn't just mean "existing." It means "diagnosed, or having
exhibited signs that a physician should have investigated and then
diagnosed."

Doesn't it?

JL
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:07 PM, paul johnson <paulzjoh at mtnhome.com> wrote:

> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       paul johnson <paulzjoh at MTNHOME.COM>
> Subject:      Re: Somewhat OT: pre-existing
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> paul johnson wrote;
>
> Just as there are no side effects, there is only what the medicine does.
>
>
> On 10/28/2012 8:10 AM, David Barnhart wrote:
> > Aren't all conditions pre-existing until they're diagnosed?
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
> --
> Slogan of the Romney family: "Money to get power, power to protect
> money." My apologies to the Medicis
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>



--
"If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list