on reversed "substitute" (intransitive version)

[Arnold Zwicky]

On Mar 4, 2013, at 6:28 AM, Laurence Horn <laurence.horn at YALE.EDU> wrote:

> The objection (or, to put it more neutrally, the non-occurring example) for us old-timers arises from the preposition governed by "substitute".  You can replace butter with olive oil, or equivalently (as in your Mac dictionary examples) substitute olive for butter, but you can't substitute butter with olive oil or vice versa.  In fact I still have trouble figuring out what's being moved in and what's being deleted in such cases, but as Wiktionary says this use is increasing despite the carping (or the non-comprehension) from the old-timers.
>
> We've certainly discussed it to death here, and there are no doubt Language Log or other blogs on the topic, as Ben will remind us.

i've gone through the topic on this mailing list far too many times over the years.  here's a compact summary on my blog:

http://arnoldzwicky.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/two-remarks-on-reversals/

i won't be posting on the topic again, since i have nothing new to add.

but the topic is a poignant example of the failure of institutional memory.

arnold

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org