The reliability of dates on websites

Laurence Horn laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Fri Mar 15 21:00:40 UTC 2013


On Mar 15, 2013, at 9:48 PM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:

> But fortunately, no lives are at stake.
>
>

Not even cats'.  And not even half-lives.

LH
>
> On 3/15/13, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
>> -----------------------
>> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
>> Subject:      Re: The reliability of dates on websites
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> At 3/15/2013 11:13 AM, ADSGarson O'Toole wrote:
>>> Words and phrases can have commercial value. People will be planting
>>> evidence with fake dates.
>>
>> And what do we propose to do about faked dates on *paper*
>> imprints?  It's been known to happen.  Let alone simple, innocent
>> mistakes, or later confusions about the year because publication was
>> before Lady Day?
>>
>> I suspect the same kinds of confirmatory arguments and evidence can
>> be applied to both electrons and paper.  Or does Heisenberg's
>> uncertainty principle apply only to the former?
>>
>> Joel
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>
>
> --
> "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list