beast
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Mon Feb 10 17:47:18 UTC 2014
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
> CNN describes a football player as "a beast on the field, a great leader."
>
> Used to be, a "beast" was a kinda bad thing. But hey, football.
Is your "but hey," a relative of "because"?
I wonder whether it's necessarily the case that a beast ("on the field" can be implied) is necessarily a great leader. Lawrence Taylor was both, but there are others who are beasts and not especially leaders.
I'm also not sure whether calling someone a beast does or doesn't imply great strength and/or size; I can imagine Peyton Manning, who has neither, being considered a beast in the sense of tough to contend with or counter.
Also, in a sports context, one of the prominent uses applied to teams rather than players, especially in the frame ____ of the East. So Georgetown, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, or UConn would alternately be described as (the) Beast of the East, back when there was a Big East Conference (yes, there's one now, but it's…well, less big). Beast of the West (say for UCLA in the 60s-70s) was much less likely--"best of/in the West", maybe, but not really the same.
LH
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list