Raleigh, N.C. -- awesome or aw-dropping?

[Laurence Horn]

On Feb 14, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Ben Zimmer wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Laurence Horn <laurence.horn at yale.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Cf. HOG and DOG.
>>>
>>> JL
>>
>> Right.  I think we discussed these a while back.  For me (NYC, b. 1945), nothing rhymes with "dog" but "blawg".
>
> On the pronunciation of "blog" vs. "blawg", see my Language Log post of 1/24/06:
>
> ----
> http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002780.html
> For speakers with the cot-caught merger of low back vowels (such as
> most residents of the western U.S.), the vowel in _blog_ merges with
> the vowel in _law_, with the result that _blawg_ is homonymous with
> _blog_. Speakers without the merger tend to use the _cot_ vowel for
> most words ending in _-og_, with the exception of _dog_ and
> occasionally other common words. _Blog_ is not (yet!) common enough to
> be subject to this lexical diffusion and thus remains distinct from
> _blawg_ for most speakers lacking the merger.
> ----
>
> I don't think "blog" has become common enough in the intervening six
> years to join the "dog" class for us non-mergerers.
>
Is there anything else in your "dog" class?  As noted, I don't have anything in mine, however common--other than "blawg", which is quite un-, and which of course qualifies for membership in the class only as a spelling pronunciation.  It doesn't seem as though frequency really plays a role for me, except perhaps for the fact that "dog" is more frequent than any of its non-rhyming rivals. Do other NYCers share this intuition?

LH

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org