bodice-ripper (1978), bodice-ripping (1979)

[Laurence Horn]

Agreed.  Whatever happened to "racy"?  That allows for the appropriate wiggle room.

LH


On May 6, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Charles C Doyle wrote:

> I question the descriptor "sexually explicit" in the OED's definition!
>
> Of course, such explicitness would be a matter of degree.  But aren't bodice rippers typically aimed at "proper" women who enjoy a bit of oblique spiciness?  Such novels, sold at airport newsstands, are a far cry from porn!
>
> Well, maybe to the sensibility of English women, they do count as porn?
>
> --Charlie
> ________________________________________
> Poster:       Ben Zimmer-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> OED has "bodice-ripper" = 'a sexually explicit romantic novel' from
> Sept. 1979. Slightly earlier:
>
> ---
> Charitey Simmons, "Dizzying Passion Ruffles the Pages of 'Hot' Historical Novel"
> Chicago Tribune, Feb. 8, 1978, Section 2, p. 4, col. 1
> Publishers call them hot historicals as opposed to either the virginal
> variety Barbara Cartland writes or to the bodice rippers "because
> that's usually what happens to the heroines," Price [sc. Linda Price
> of Bantam Books] explained.
> ---
>
> And here's the verbal noun "bodice-ripping":
>
> ---
> Suzanne Dolezal, "Sizzling Formula for Selling Books"
> Boston Globe, Feb. 21, 1979, p. 59, col. 1
> [Barbara Alpert of Ballantine Books:] "The books are geared to women's
> sensitivities -- ideal love with a little bodice-ripping. You don't
> take them seriously."
> ---
>
> --bgz
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org