[Ads-l] "set-top box" -- needs a retronym ... or something else?

[Joel Berson]

That's why "cable" is in parentheses.

Joel

 

      From: Dan Goncharoff <thegonch at GMAIL.COM>
 To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU 
 Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 11:39 AM
 Subject: Re: [ADS-L] "set-top box" -- needs a retronym ... or something else?
   
You have to also consider the fact that the "box" is not necessary
connected to a cable provider. A Roku, for example, only requires an
internet connection, and can work off wifi.
DanG


On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Joel Berson <berson at att.net> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender:      American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:      Joel Berson <berson at ATT.NET>
> Subject:      "set-top box" -- needs a retronym ... or something else?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Considering that all new TV sets are "flat" and couldn't support a box on t=
> op of them, does "set-top (cable) box" need a retronym?=C2=A0=20
>
>
> Or would it be something else?=C2=A0 That is, if the term for today is to b=
> e formed by _removal_ of the qualifier "set-top" -- to "cable box" -- and t=
> he old/current term is to be left as is -- "set-top (cable) box" -- is the =
> "neologism" a "retronym", or something else?
>
>
> Joel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org