[Ads-l] "on the regular"

[Joel Berson]

Just "regularly", I think -- that is, "frequently," via the now-standard instrument.  (Well, there are two or three and two more being constructed.)

Joel

      From: Dan Goncharoff <thegonch at GMAIL.COM>
 To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU 
 Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 2:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [ADS-L] "on the regular"
   
"on the regular" measuring equipment?

DanG

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Like "on the QT"?
>
> "On the down-low?"
>
> "On the cheap"?
>
> JL
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Bill Mullins <amcombill at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > "If gravitational waves don't require cataclysmic collisions between
> enormous black holes for us to measure them, but can be detected on the
> regular, we can use them to try to figure out a whole lot more than just
> whether or not Einstein was totally right."
> > http://kottke.org/16/06/gravity-is-the-new-light
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
>
>
> --
> "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org