[Ads-l] "man non-avoidance
Robin Hamilton
robin.hamilton3 at VIRGINMEDIA.COM
Tue Oct 11 10:27:21 UTC 2016
Best case yet I've seen for the utility of the gender-neutral "they".
"Every man for themselves" (or is that misconcorded?) could be happily accepted
by either a fish or a bicycle.
Well, actually, no, but it would have been (marginally) less awkward than what
the Late Deserting "I'm not going to vote for him, but I'm still endorsing him"
Son-of-Ann said. Or is it the other way around? Confusing times we live in ...
Not man-people or women-people but person-peoples ...
Robin
>
> On 11 October 2016 at 11:10 Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM>
> wrote:
>
>
> Dana Bash, CNN, reports that Paul Ryan has told Republicans,
>
> "Every man for him or herself. I know what I just did there, but let's go
> on."
>
> She was embarrassed over "man" non-avoidance. Or was it just the twisted
> grammar? Many ask, "Which is a greater threat to our world?"
>
> JL
>
> --
> "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the
> truth."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list