[Ads-l] Berkeley and gender neutral words

[Peter Reitan]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but evidence of being "more likely" to select 
certain kinds of photos in response to different words is not the same 
as evidence of being "demeaning, offensive, sexist or the like."  Or is 
there more to the study than you conveyed in the brief reference to it 
here?

------ Original Message ------
From: "Alice Faber" <afaber at panix.com>
To: ADS-L at listserv.uga.edu
Sent: 7/20/2019 5:31:28 PM
Subject: Re: Berkeley and gender neutral words

>---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
>Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>Poster:       Alice Faber <afaber at PANIX.COM>
>Subject:      Re: Berkeley and gender neutral words
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>On 7/20/19 4:13 PM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
>>  Is there any pre-craze empirical evidence that women in general found such
>>  words demeaning, offensive, sexist, or the like?
>
>Actually, there is. I don't remember the citation, but back when I
>taught intro linguistics and psycholinguistics, there was a study we
>discussed where the experimental task was to find pictures in magazines
>to illustrate specific words. When participants were finding pictures of
>firefighters, mail carriers, flaggers and the like they were more likely
>to select pictures of women than when they were finding pictures of
>firemen, mailmen, flagmen, etc. These participants may well have claimed
>not to think of the latter as inherently gendered terms, but they
>certainly acted as if they were.
>
>AF
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org


------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org