[Ads-l] No word for X
Laurence Horn
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Sun Jul 21 20:41:47 UTC 2019
> On Jul 21, 2019, at 4:19 PM, Mark Mandel <markamandel at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> As someone points out, there's no tone of voice or facial cues in email.
>
> MAM
…which is why God invented emoticons and emojis.
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 9:33 AM Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Whose irony is this anyway?
>>
>> JL
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 9:07 PM Mark Mandel <markamandel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I assume you aren't seriously generalizing from one data point.
>>>
>>> MAM
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019, 11:43 AM Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So English is more expressive.
>>>>
>>>> JL
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:06 AM Wilson Gray <hwgray at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> There appears to be no word in Latin for "sexy."
>>>>>
>>>>> Um-research suggests that there appears to be no word for "sexy" in
>> any
>>>>> language other than English.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 1:16 PM Jonathan Lighter <
>>> wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There appears to be no word in Latin for "sexy."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JL
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l
mailing list