[Ads-l] retroactive continuity

[Stephen Goranson]

Retroactive continuity is a useful term. Retcon is ugly; even more likely to be misinterpreted; should not be used except to anathematize it....oops, wrong list. :)

Wolfhart Pannenberg has been mentioned as the source for the Vorlage.

 “Kontinuität nach rückwärts”<https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-e&q=%E2%80%9CKontinuit%C3%A4t+nach+r%C3%BCckw%C3%A4rts.%E2%80%9D&spell=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjK_redg9vwAhWQSzABHTKqAeIQBSgAegQIARAw> (not “Kontinuät nach rückwärts.”), though, was used earlier by someone
Pannenberg almost surely read: Karl Barth, <https://books.google.com/books?id=LPzYAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA58&dq=%22Kontinuit%C3%A4t+nach+r%C3%BCckw%C3%A4rts.%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjP0cfRg9vwAhUJVzABHUUgCYUQ6AEwAHoECAMQAg>
Die kirchliche Dogmatik: Bd. Die Lehre von Gott - Page 58, (Zürich, 1946).

Stephen Goranson

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Die_kirchliche_Dogmatik_Bd_Die_Lehre_von/LPzYAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Kontinuit%C3%A4t+nach+r%C3%BCckw%C3%A4rts.%22&pg=PA58&printsec=frontcover
[https://books.google.com/books/content?id=LPzYAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=1&edge=curl&imgtk=AFLRE718-z-h_gAwyQ0EPQ2G_gloQyeIBgH6K-hiAcFRte2W5oE85ODpm5o66HjyJxyokuYnFcM_3M1SXPJuxFz7imockC4-NI1ir8Y52WN6b9DGkWdUxs9hF0mm98FmD8YLvM24hNvz]<https://www.google.com/books/edition/Die_kirchliche_Dogmatik_Bd_Die_Lehre_von/LPzYAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Kontinuit%C3%A4t+nach+r%C3%BCckw%C3%A4rts.%22&pg=PA58&printsec=frontcover>
Die kirchliche Dogmatik: Bd. Die Lehre von Gott<https://www.google.com/books/edition/Die_kirchliche_Dogmatik_Bd_Die_Lehre_von/LPzYAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Kontinuit%C3%A4t+nach+r%C3%BCckw%C3%A4rts.%22&pg=PA58&printsec=frontcover>
/
www.google.com




------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org