[Ads-l] typo?

Amy West medievalist at W-STS.COM
Sun Dec 1 13:42:30 UTC 2024


On 11/30/24 00:00, ADS-L automatic digest system wrote:
> Date:    Fri, 29 Nov 2024 19:47:07 +0000
> From:    James Landau<jjjrlandau at NETSCAPE.COM>
> Subject: typo?
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/anglo-saxons-plagiarized-a-roman-coin-and-it-s-full-of-typos/ar-AA1uZwxr?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=ad7c4875a2654e89fe505b52b9bfabb0&ei=12
>
> The above-referenced on-line page (too complicated to reproduce here) describes a copy of a Roman solidus apparently copied by some Anglo-Saxon from a Roman solidus, but with numerous spelling errors.  The page strongly suggests that this was a one-of-a-kind product, so most likely hand-carved rather than stamped from a master.
> Is the word "typo" correct fpr the spelling errors on a one-of-a-kind piece of jewely, probably hand -carved?
>
> James Landau
> jjjrlandau at netscape.com


Keeping in mind that spelling was not standardized back then, and given 
that this MSN article is being written for a general audience, I think 
"typo" is the best that the article's author is going to do. I think 
medievalists would call them misreadings or transcription errors/changes 
due to the minter's lack of knowledge of Latin. In fact, I think we'd 
read them as showing the minter's lack of knowledge of Latin and being a 
result of a partial/imperfect/mis- understanding of the original.

---Amy West

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org


More information about the Ads-l mailing list