Continuing the morphology and syntax discussion

[Ann Spinney]

I would also be interested in following the discussion although my interests are cognate (I am not a linguist) and I could not attend the conference this year. ~Ann

Dr. Ann Morrison Spinney, PhD
Ethnomusicologist
http://www.annmorrisonspinney.com




On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:09 AM, George Fulford <single_sculler at ME.COM> wrote:

I would be very interested in participating in this discussion as I think that the structure of Algonquian languages challenges the conventional wisdom of how we understand these two aspects of grammar.

George Fulford
Department of Anthropology
University of Winnipeg

On 2012-10-30, at 3:07 PM, Richard RHODES <rrhodes at berkeley.edu> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> I'm just putting out a feeler to see if there is interest in continuing the syntax morphology discussion online.
> 
> It seemed like Julie Brittain's paper on Sunday morning put us right in the middle of it again, but half of the folks were already gone by then.
> 
> Let me know if it's worth talking in this venue.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Rich Rhodes
> 
> Richard A. Rhodes
> Department of Linguistics
> 1203 Dwinelle Hall #2650
> University of California
> Berkeley, 94720
> 
> 





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/algonquiana/attachments/20121031/d4c5d058/attachment.htm>