Continuing the morphology and syntax discussion

[Robert Brightman]

Having missed the realtime prototype last Sunday, I'd like to follow a 
follow-up.

Rob Brightman

On 10/31/12 9:57 AM, Ann Spinney wrote:
> I would also be interested in following the discussion although my
> interests are cognate (I am not a linguist) and I could not attend the
> conference this year. ~Ann
>
> Dr. Ann Morrison Spinney, PhD
> Ethnomusicologist
> http://www.annmorrisonspinney.com
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:09 AM, George Fulford <single_sculler at ME.COM
> <mailto:single_sculler at ME.COM>> wrote:
>
> I would be very interested in participating in this discussion as I
> think that the structure of Algonquian languages challenges the
> conventional wisdom of how we understand these two aspects of grammar.
>
> George Fulford
> Department of Anthropology
> University of Winnipeg
>
> On 2012-10-30, at 3:07 PM, Richard RHODES <rrhodes at berkeley.edu
> <mailto:rrhodes at berkeley.edu>> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm just putting out a feeler to see if there is interest in
>> continuing the syntax morphology discussion online.
>>
>> It seemed like Julie Brittain's paper on Sunday morning put us right
>> in the middle of it again, but half of the folks were already gone by
>> then.
>>
>> Let me know if it's worth talking in this venue.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Rich Rhodes
>>
>> Richard A. Rhodes
>> Department of Linguistics
>> 1203 Dwinelle Hall #2650
>> University of California
>> Berkeley, 94720
>>
>>
>
>
>