Continuing the morphology and syntax discussion

[Tanya Slavin]

I would be interested too, I think its a great idea. Maybe we could
take it out of the e-mail and set up a google group discussion or some
other forum like that?
tanya.



On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Robert Brightman <rbrightm at reed.edu> wrote:
> Having missed the realtime prototype last Sunday, I'd like to follow a
> follow-up.
>
> Rob Brightman
>
>
> On 10/31/12 9:57 AM, Ann Spinney wrote:
>>
>> I would also be interested in following the discussion although my
>> interests are cognate (I am not a linguist) and I could not attend the
>> conference this year. ~Ann
>>
>> Dr. Ann Morrison Spinney, PhD
>> Ethnomusicologist
>> http://www.annmorrisonspinney.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:09 AM, George Fulford <single_sculler at ME.COM
>> <mailto:single_sculler at ME.COM>> wrote:
>>
>> I would be very interested in participating in this discussion as I
>> think that the structure of Algonquian languages challenges the
>> conventional wisdom of how we understand these two aspects of grammar.
>>
>> George Fulford
>> Department of Anthropology
>> University of Winnipeg
>>
>> On 2012-10-30, at 3:07 PM, Richard RHODES <rrhodes at berkeley.edu
>> <mailto:rrhodes at berkeley.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I'm just putting out a feeler to see if there is interest in
>>> continuing the syntax morphology discussion online.
>>>
>>> It seemed like Julie Brittain's paper on Sunday morning put us right
>>> in the middle of it again, but half of the folks were already gone by
>>> then.
>>>
>>> Let me know if it's worth talking in this venue.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Rich Rhodes
>>>
>>> Richard A. Rhodes
>>> Department of Linguistics
>>> 1203 Dwinelle Hall #2650
>>> University of California
>>> Berkeley, 94720
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>