Continuing the morphology and syntax discussion

[Monica Macaulay]

Well, we already have the Algonquiana list.  Some of us (linguists) had thought that the non-linguists would be annoyed to get lots of email about linguistics, and that it would be better to form a separate list - in fact, I established one on LINGUIST today, but had to email them for help because their directions are not the clearest.  But there have been so many messages today saying that we shouldn't separate the groups, that I guess we shouldn't.  Unless anyone else wants to speak up on the other side of the issue!

If you know of anyone who might like to be on the list but isn't, have them go here:  http://linguistlist.org/lists/get-lists.cfm, to sign up.

- Monica

On Oct 31, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Tanya Slavin wrote:

> I would be interested too, I think its a great idea. Maybe we could
> take it out of the e-mail and set up a google group discussion or some
> other forum like that?
> tanya.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Robert Brightman <rbrightm at reed.edu> wrote:
>> Having missed the realtime prototype last Sunday, I'd like to follow a
>> follow-up.
>> 
>> Rob Brightman
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/31/12 9:57 AM, Ann Spinney wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would also be interested in following the discussion although my
>>> interests are cognate (I am not a linguist) and I could not attend the
>>> conference this year. ~Ann
>>> 
>>> Dr. Ann Morrison Spinney, PhD
>>> Ethnomusicologist
>>> http://www.annmorrisonspinney.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:09 AM, George Fulford <single_sculler at ME.COM
>>> <mailto:single_sculler at ME.COM>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would be very interested in participating in this discussion as I
>>> think that the structure of Algonquian languages challenges the
>>> conventional wisdom of how we understand these two aspects of grammar.
>>> 
>>> George Fulford
>>> Department of Anthropology
>>> University of Winnipeg
>>> 
>>> On 2012-10-30, at 3:07 PM, Richard RHODES <rrhodes at berkeley.edu
>>> <mailto:rrhodes at berkeley.edu>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Folks,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm just putting out a feeler to see if there is interest in
>>>> continuing the syntax morphology discussion online.
>>>> 
>>>> It seemed like Julie Brittain's paper on Sunday morning put us right
>>>> in the middle of it again, but half of the folks were already gone by
>>>> then.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me know if it's worth talking in this venue.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Rich Rhodes
>>>> 
>>>> Richard A. Rhodes
>>>> Department of Linguistics
>>>> 1203 Dwinelle Hall #2650
>>>> University of California
>>>> Berkeley, 94720
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>