correction (again)

potet POTETJP at
Wed Jul 18 18:37:30 UTC 2001

Sorry, Paz B. NAYLOR pointed at a second mistake, so I'd better send a
corrected version of my question.
[Although they do not bear on the portent of my question, these are big
mistakes. so I slapped my face twice in punishment.]

I have got a question. As expected, three of the verbs are reduced to their
taním for itaním
áni for aníhin
pangákoq for ipangákoq

Why isn't tuparín reduced to its base tupád?

Jean-Paul G. POTET
B. P. 46

More information about the An-lang mailing list