resending RE: Prenasalized stops
Paz B. Naylor
pnaylor at UMICH.EDU
Mon May 31 20:39:01 UTC 2010
For some reason, the text of my message got ‘mucked up’ when I sent it a
few minutes ago.
I am re-sending it in its proper form.
_____
From: Paz B. Naylor [mailto:pnaylor at umich.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 4:28 PM
To: 'Roger Mills'
Cc: 'an-lang at anu.edu.au'
Subject: RE: [An-lang] Prenasalized stops
Roger,
I am not sure if what I quote from something I have written addresses your
question.
For all it’s worth, here it is.
‘Prenasalisation’.
The term, “prenasalisation” refers to the
morphosyntactic process by which nonnasal consonants are usually ‘replaced
by their homorganic nasal counterparts upon affixation of a
prefix with a final velar nasal -ng [-ŋ]. At the same time,
the final velar nasal consonant of the prefix is usually
replaced by the nasal consonant homorganic to the initial consonant
of the wordbase.
For example: when the prefix mang-/nang- or pang- is
appended to a word beginning with [p], e.g., putol ‘cut’,
this is what happens:
1. the final velar nasal [-ŋ] of the prefix is
‘replaced’ by the nasal
consonant homorganic to the initial cosonant
of the wordbase [p]:
mang- > mam-; nang- > nam-; pang- > pam-
2 the initial stop [p-] of the wordbase putol is usually
nasalised (i.e., ‘replaced’ by
its homorganic nasal consonant /m/ : putol > mutol);
3. mam- + mutol > mamutol ‘go cutting (flowers, wood,
etc.’);
nam- + mutol > namutol ‘went cutting’ (flowers, wood
etc.);
pam- + mutol > pamutol ‘ (instrument) for
cutting’
There are cases when occurrence or non-occurrence of
prenasalisation (of the wordbase) marks a semantic distinction.
For example: (a) when the wordbase bili ‘buy’, is
prefixed with pam (< pang-), the initial consonant [b] is retained:
pambili, (instrument/use) for
buying’.
(b) when bili is prefixed with
mam (< mang-) or nam < nang-), the initial consonant [b] is ‘nasalised’:
mamili ‘go shopping’ and
namili ‘went shopping’.
It’s been a long, long time since we last communicated.
Trust all is well with you.
Warmest regards and best wishes, Paz
Paz Buenaventura Naylor, Ph.D.
Emeritus: Associate Professor, Asian Languages and Cultures
Program Associate, Linguistics
Faculty Associate, Center for SSEAsian Studies
Formerly: Assistant Professor, Linguistics
Lecturer, Teaching Fellow, Romance Languages
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109
_____
From: an-lang-bounces at anu.edu.au [mailto:an-lang-bounces at anu.edu.au] On
Behalf Of Roger Mills
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 10:28 PM
To: an-lang at anu.edu.au
Subject: [An-lang] Prenasalized stops
Dear Colleagues: In another context, a friend has raised an interesting
question:
(QUOTE)
Are prenasalised consonants disfavoured as second elements of clusters?
That is, in languages that have both unitary prenasalised Cs [like /mb)/,
say], and clusters whose second member is a stop [like /lb/], are clusters
of the sort /lmb)/ likely to be disallowed?
(I was unsuccessful at Googling this, all I could get is discussion of
whether prenasalised Cs should be *themselves* analysed *as* clusters.)
(End quote)
Certainly not in the handful of AN languages I'm familiar with, but perhaps
in others ???
Thanks in advance for any replies.
Roger Mills
_____
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/an-lang/attachments/20100531/34ccce5a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
An-lang mailing list
An-lang at anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/an-lang
More information about the An-lang
mailing list