Arabic-L:LING:New Dissertation
Dilworth Parkinson
dilworth_parkinson at BYU.EDU
Wed Jul 18 18:06:46 UTC 2007
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arabic-L: Wed 18 Jul 2007
Moderator: Dilworth Parkinson <dilworth_parkinson at byu.edu>
[To post messages to the list, send them to arabic-l at byu.edu]
[To unsubscribe, send message from same address you subscribed from to
listserv at byu.edu with first line reading:
unsubscribe arabic-l ]
-------------------------Directory------------------------------------
1) Subject:New Dissertation
-------------------------Messages-----------------------------------
1)
Date: 18 Jul 2007
From:reposted from LINGUIST
Subject:New Dissertation
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:40:13
From: Muhammet Gunaydin < gunaydin at alumni.upenn.edu >
Subject: Al-Sirafi's theory of 'lingua-logical' grammar: An
analytical study of the grammatical work of al-Sirafi...
Institution: University of Pennsylvania
Program: Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2006
Author: Muhammet gunaydin
Dissertation Title: Al-Sirafi's theory of 'lingua-logical' grammar: An
analytical study of the grammatical work of al-Sirafi
(Sharh Kitab Sibawayhi) within the context of a discussion
on language and logic in medieval Islam
Dissertation URL: http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3211077/
Linguistic Field(s): History of Linguistics
Ling & Literature
Philosophy of Language
Dissertation Director(s):
Roger M. A. Allen
Joseph E Lowry
Barbara von Schlegel
Dissertation Abstract:
This is a study of the problematic relationship between language,
grammar,
and logic in the linguistic thought of Abu Said al-Sirafi (d. 979), the
judge and grammarian. It offers an analytical study of the first seven
chapters of his famous work on grammar, Sharh Kitab Sibawayhi within the
context of the famous debate over Arabic grammar and Aristotelian logic
that took place in Baghdad, in 932 C.E. between him and Abu Bishr
Matta ibn
Yunus (d. 940), the philosopher and logician. In the debate, against
Matta's thesis that logic is an instrument by which we differentiate
correct speech from incorrect and sound meaning from unsound, al-Sirafi
argues that correct speech can only be distinguished from incorrect by
grammatical investigation, and sound meaning from unsound by reason.
Al-Sirafi further argues that grammar includes logic, and thus there
is no
need to study logic separately. This study examines al-Sirafi's Sharh to
investigate whether these ideas are based on a verifiable linguistic
theory
found in his Sharh, or stated only for the sake of discussion during the
debate.
At the end of the study it is concluded that al-Sirafi's approaches to
linguistic issues are consistent and complementary to each other in both
the debate and the Sharh. However, there is no evidence found in the
Sharh
to support his criticism of logic put forward in the debate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
End of Arabic-L: 18 Jul 2007
More information about the Arabic-l
mailing list