Theories

[Andrew Carnie]

Hi All,

Oliver Currie wrote:

>Is CELTLING meant to be an exclusively _generativist_ list? I
>have not yet seen any non-generative linguistics discussed here?

Celtlign is most definitely not a generativist-only list. *All*
theories and approaches are welcome. I myself am an MIT generativist,
which probably accounts for the strong bias in this direction, but
non-generative discussion is very welcome. The only constaints
on this list are that (1) the discussion be about grammar, from
the theoretical linguistic stance (not the pedagogical one). (2)
the posting covers a modern Celtic language.

Cheers,

Andrew