Allowing square brackets in %eng
Kevin Donnelly
kevin at dotmon.com
Wed Mar 14 23:00:27 UTC 2012
Hi Brian
::::On Wednesday 14 March 2012 Brian MacWhinney said::::
> We are not currently considering the %eng line as anything that is tightly
> defined. There is no expectation of one-to-one alignment and so on. If
> you want to create your own system of codes there and then avoid CHECK
> altogether, you can just rename it to %xeng and CHECK and Chatter will not
> look at it at all.
> However, the change you suggest involves tinkering with the basic
> mechanism of processing square brackets which doesn't seem like a good
> idea. Alternatively, you could just have xxx's and that should work okay
> and then you could leave this as %eng.
Nice to know about %xeng. But I think we'll just change our conventions, so
that we don't get square brackets with no spaces. I understand entirely about
opening a can of worms if you start fiddling with existing behaviour! Thanks
for the info.
--
Pob hwyl / Best wishes
Kevin Donnelly
kevindonnelly.org.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibolts" group.
To post to this group, send email to chibolts at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to chibolts+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chibolts?hl=en.
More information about the Chibolts
mailing list