Discrepancy between KIDEVAL and VOCD statistics

[Nick Riches]

Hi.

I'm posting a query on behalf of a student who has noted a high VOCD, 
calculated using KIDEVAL. The child is aged 4;2. The VOCD score in KIDEVAL 
is around 85. However, when the VOCD program is used, the score falls to 
59. I've reproduced the commands below

kideval @ +LinkAge +leng +t*CHI: +dfp~"4;-4;5"
vocd  +t*CHI @

The KIDEVAL VOCD is close to the population mean, suggesting that it's 
being calculated in a consistent manner. However, I'm struggling to 
understand the discrepancy with the score calculated by the VOCD program.

NB I would like to upload the manuscript itself, but the student project 
has quite strict confidentiality rules.

Thanks

Nick

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibolts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chibolts+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to chibolts at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chibolts/92cdc6cf-1564-4450-8fa3-561d471a78d1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/chibolts/attachments/20170331/7dcc4e6b/attachment.htm>