New way to transcribe song lyrics?
Lulu
lulusong at gmail.com
Tue Feb 25 17:11:40 UTC 2020
Thank you so much, Brian! This is really helpful.
Best,
Lulu
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 11:58:05 AM UTC-5, macw wrote:
>
> Dear Lulu,
> Thanks for re-checking this. The one thing you probably want to avoid
> is marking every word in a song with @si. That would mess up all sorts of
> other analysis programs. Using +” at the beginning of each line of song
> works fine, unless you are really concerned with noting that the material
> is a song. I imagine it is pretty clear in most cases. If you really
> want to emphasize that a given stretch of lines is a song, then you could
> use the <lyrics> [=! singing] format. If they are very long songs and you
> need to analyze them specifically, you could even use Gem markers.
>
> -- Brian MacWhinney
> Teresa Heinz Professor of Cognitive Psychology,
> Computational Linguistics,
> and Modern Languages, CMU
>
> > On Feb 25, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Lulu <lulu... at gmail.com <javascript:>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Brian,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply! You are right -- I double checked the manual and
> found that the parts about songs and singing remained the same in the
> latest manual. My transcriber thought one part was taken out but was
> apparently mistaken.
> >
> > She used to transcribe lyrics in two ways:
> > <lyrics> [=! singing]
> > @si
> >
> > But I think you just provided a third way (as quotations) which may be
> more preferable. The manual also mentioned of treating large chunks as
> regular speech and put singing in comments. If we are transcribing the
> morning meetings in preschool classrooms, which way do you think would be
> the best way to transcribe the singing of the teacher and children?
> >
> > Thanks again!
> >
> > Best,
> > Lulu
> >
> > On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 7:48:16 PM UTC-5, macw wrote:
> > Dear Lulu,
> > I can't think of any change at any point that was specifically
> about marking songs. I think perhaps you are referring to a change made
> three years ago in the method for marking quotations. If that is what you
> are referring to, then there is indeed an easy way of marking that a whole
> utterance is a quotation. This is to precede the utterance with +" Is
> that possibly what you might be referring to?
> >
> > -- Brian MacWhinney, Teresa Heinz
> > Professor of Cognitive Psychology,
> > Computational Linguistics,
> > and Modern Languages, CMU
> >
> >> On Feb 21, 2020, at 5:29 PM, Lulu <lulu... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi! My transcribers just brought to my attention that the new CHAT
> manual changed the way how song lyrics should be transcribed from the
> previous manual. Specifically, instead of marking a whole utterance as a
> verse in a song with a symbol at the beginning and the end of the verse
> respectively, now the transcriber would need to add a symbol AFTER EACH
> WORD. The new way seems very labor-intensive. Is that right? Why the
> change? If it has to be done that way, is there any method to make it
> easier for the transcriber?
> >>
> >> Any insights or tips would be appreciated. Thanks!
> >> Lulu Song
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "chibolts" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to chib... at googlegroups.com.
> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chibolts/30baa1ef-a63f-47a1-95da-03b4c941eb96%40googlegroups.com.
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "chibolts" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to chib... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chibolts/cb9a40f0-8a33-4bc6-8208-f1f91b211746%40googlegroups.com.
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibolts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chibolts+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chibolts/2e7efd6f-bf5d-4aac-b5e1-b512f6cb2190%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/chibolts/attachments/20200225/7eeb18cc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Chibolts
mailing list