Phonological and Semantic Errors - is there a better way?

[Sophie Brook]

Hi, 

As far as I'm aware there's no [+ phon] postcode to get a phonological 
measure of error. Is there a better way to generate phonological *and* 
semantic error frequencies than what I'm currently doing?


I'm currently using this code to generate an excel spreadsheet for error 
frequencies (which includes phonology).  

freq +s"\[\* *\]" +t*PAR * +d2 +fS +2 


And also using this code to generate specific error frequencies e.g., [+ 
sem]. [+ gram], [+ jar] etc where the postcode is interchangeable each time 
you run it. 

freq +s"<+gram >" +t*PAR * +d2 +fS +2 

Thanks, 

Sophie 

(she/her)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibolts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chibolts+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chibolts/6c66a73a-a1aa-437f-969f-6f639a684dd3n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/chibolts/attachments/20230727/4ada7997/attachment.htm>