Corpora: CFP: 3 INLG-2000 Workshops / June 12, 2000

Tue Feb 15 16:43:57 UTC 2000

			Call for participation

			   Three workshops
		to be held in parallel just before the

	 International Natural Language Generation Conference
			      INLG-2000
			 Mitzpe Ramon, Israel

		     Workshop date: 12 June 2000
		  Conference dates: 13-16 June 2000

       Conference home page: http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~nlg2000/

Workshops:

WS1 : Analysis for generation
      Chair: Svetlana Sheremetieva, New Mexico State University

WS2 : Why care for cognitive modeling when building NLG systems?
      Chair: Ralf Klabunde, University of Heidelberg

WS3 : Coherence in Generated Multimedia
      Co-chairs: Kees van Deemter, University of Brighton
                 John Lee, University of Edinburgh

Workshop participants must register for the main conference.

Each workshop has individual submission dates. Please check the
announcement for the appropriate deadline.

======================================================================
		    WS1 : Analysis for generation
======================================================================

		       Analysis for Generation

	       http://crl.nmsu.edu/Events/external.htm

The last decade has seen an explosion in the work done in the field of
NLG with the emphasis on the development of independent NLG
applications rather than generation modules of MT systems. While it
seems natural to consider problems of analysis and generation as two
sides of a coin in such NLP applications as MT, researchers working on
"pure" generation systems sometimes treat problems arising at every
stage of generation -- content specification, sentence planning, and
surface realization -- as independent. Time may be ripe for examining
the mutual utility of analysis and generation in greater detail. The
impetus is, as can be expected, the goal of minimizing system-building
efforts in language engineering.

The workshop proposes to address the issues of

- Analysis as part of generation.

  A modicum of analysis is, in fact, an essential part of every
  generation system.  The input to generation systems such as raw data
  in tables, lists, diagrams, elements of various databases or even
  text snippets that are fed into the system directly by a user still
  must first be somehow processed, that is, analyzed The question
  arises whether it is possible to develop criteria to better choose
  and integrate analysis techniques which could be efficiently applied
  at different stages of generation.

- Reusability and adaptability of analysis techniques and tools for
  generation.

  While it is not uncommon to believe that generation and analysis are
  not reversible, a number of contributions over the years have
  discussed reversibility of analysis and generation resources,
  especially the grammars and demonstrated how the use of reversible
  grammars may lead to efficient and flexible natural language parsing
  and generation systems. It is worth discussing constraints on
  reversibility.

- Reusability of analysis knowledge and methodology of its acquisition
  for generation.

  Generation and analysis are closely related in that both processes
  use many similar resources, and often it is less expensive to
  reorganize an existing "analysis" resource (e.g., an analysis
  lexicon) than to acquire one for generation from scratch.It is worth
  discussing how to establish whether a resource built for analysis
  can be used for generation and at what price.

In particular the workshop will seek to address the following issues:

I. Applications of analysis in generation and types of analysis
techniques used in NLG.

II. Reusability and adaptability of knowledge resources in generation
and analysis

- knowledge representation
   - lexicon format and indexing
   - rule writing format
- knowledge acquisition and adaptation
   - reversibility of grammars
   - use of microtheories
- architectural issues
   - converting (morphological, syntactic, semantic, etc.) analyzers
     into generator modules
   - architectural peculiarities of systems involving both analysis
     and synthesis and reusability of their modules.

FORMAT FOR SUBMISSION

Paper submissions should consist of full papers (maximum of 12 pages
Including references, 12pt font size). Each submission should include
a separate title page providing the following information: the title,
a short abstract, names and affiliations of all the authors, the full
address of the primary author (or alternate contact person), including
phone, fax, and email. See the INLG main conference page
(http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~nlg2000/) for details about the use of Latex
(preferred) or Word. Authors are asked to indicate explicitly in their
submission any special requirements that they may have (e.g. use of
VCR, internet access, data projector) beyond an overhead projector.
Please send your electronic submission(PostScript or PDF format) until
March 20 to:

Svetlana Sheremetyeva,
Computing Research Laboratory  New Mexico State University,
 USA Box30001/Dept.3CRL/Las Cruces New Mexico 88003-8001
505 646 5466 (voice)
 505 646 6218 (fax)
 lana at crl.nmsu.edu

IMPORTANT DATES
Paper submission deadline:                    March 20
Notification of acceptance:                   April 20
Camera ready paper to workshop coordinator:   April 28

Organizing Committee

Svetlana Sheremetyeva, Chair and contact person
Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, USA
lana at crl.nmsu.edu

Sergei Nirenburg
Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, USA
sergei at crl.nmsu.edu

Richard Kittredge
Department of Linguistics and Translation, University of Montreal
kittredge at IRO.UMontreal.CA

Anna Sagvall Hein
Department of linguistics, Uppsala University
Anna at ling.uu.se

Evelyne Viegas
Microsoft Corporation
evelynev at microsoft.com

Michael Zock
Language & Cognition   LIMSI - CNRS
zock at limsi.fr

======================================================================
   WS2 : Why care for cognitive modeling when building NLG systems?
======================================================================

     Why care for cognitive modeling when building NLG systems ?

	    http://pc03.idf.uni-heidelberg.de/~ralf/wkshop

WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION

Natural Language Generation (NLG) exists now for many years as a
subdiscipline of computational linguistics. Many systems have been
built with different goals and from different perspectives. While some
approaches are strongly driven by engineering concerns, others are
more concerned with insights in human language production.

By organizing this workshop we pursue three goals:

(a) to show that cognitive and engineering approaches, rather then being
    mutually exclusive, are highly complementary;
(b) to identify some of the loci where the human factor should be taken into
    account;
(c) to discuss then what methods could be used in order to enhance current
    systems or architectures by means of cognitive models of human language
    generation.

While there is no doubt that cognitive modeling is useful for testing
theories of human behavior, it is probably also quite useful in
cognitive engineering, that is, as a complementary methodology for
building systems. If the engineering point of view is overemphasised,
designers will be more concerned with the machine than with their
final users: people. In order to build truly user-friendly
NL-generators, i.e. systems which adapt themselves to users rather
than the other way around, we need a deeper understanding of the
knowledge and the processes that people use when producing
language. These kinds of insights can profitably be used when building
systems, especially if they are meant to be used by people.

At present, we observe a strong tendency towards an engineering
approach. While many researchers in the field have based their systems
on empirical research, their approach still remains more motivated by
engineering considerations (efficiency) then by psycho-linguistic
factors (the problems people face).  Yet we do believe, that
integrating the human factor into the engineering approach would
greatly enhance the overall quality (adequacy, flexibility, scope) of
the existing systems.

To approach these goals, the workshop invites full papers that deal with
any aspect of the following topics:

-       ARCHITECTURE (flexibility, decomposition and control of the process)
-       CONTENT DETERMINATION / CONCEPTUALIZATION
-       NATURE OF THE INPUT (proximity to language)
-       OUTLINE PLANNING
-       NP-GENERATION (the problem of reference)
-       LEXICAL ACCESS

For more information on the workshop and its topics have a look at the
workshop homepage.

WORKSHOP ORGANIZERS

Gerard Kempen, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
kempen at rulfsw.leidenuniv.nl

Ralf Klabunde, University of Heidelberg, Germany (Chair)
klabunde at novell1.gs.uni-heidelberg.de

Koenraad de Smedt, University of Bergen, Norway
deSmedt at hf.uib.no	

Michael Zock, LIMSI - CNRS, France
zock at limsi.fr

CONTACT INFORMATION FOR QUESTIONS

If you have any questions, please contact Michael Zock: zock at limsi.fr

FORMAT FOR SUBMISSION

Paper submissions should consist of full papers (maximum of 12 pages
including references, 12pt font size). Each submission should include
a separate title page providing the following information: the title,
a short abstract, names and affiliations of all the authors, the full
address of the primary author (or alternate contact person), including
phone, fax, and email.  Electronic submissions are preferred, and
should be sent to Ralf Klabunde until March 20. We strongly advise
standard html for electronic submissions, but PostScript or PDF form
is also possible.

Ralf Klabunde
University of Heidelberg
Center for Computational Linguistics
Karlstr. 2
69117 Heidelberg, Germany

klabunde at novell1.gs.uni-heidelberg.de

IMPORTANT DATES
Paper submission deadline:		March 20
Notification of acceptance:		April 12
Final paper to workshop coordinator:    May    2

======================================================================
	       WS3 : Coherence in Generated Multimedia
======================================================================

		  Coherence in Generated Multimedia

		http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/~john/inlg-mm

Keywords:

     - Generation of multimedia documents/presentations
     - Cross-media coreference, deixis, and anaphora
     - Media allocation, layout, and synchronization

More and more often, Natural Language Generation is performed as a
component of a larger Multimedia Presentation System, whose output
consists of language/speech combined with graphics, animation,
non-speech audio, etc. Recent years have seen a growing interest in
various issues relevant for the design of such systems, such as the
issue of multimedia system architecture (e.g., Bordegoni et al. 1997)
and media allocation (e.g., ETAI 1997-8). It is gradually becoming
clear that a Multimedia Presentation System forces its designers to
rethink some fundamental issues, at the core of which is a generalized
notion of document coherence, which subsumes the purely linguistic
notion of coherence, and which can take different forms depending on
the type of document.

This workshop, which is associated with the INLG-2000 conference,
invites submission of papers that shed light on the issue of discourse
coherence in relation to the generation of documents/ presentations in
which **natural language + at least one other medium** play a
nontrivial role. Topics of interest include but are not limited to:

- Document/presentation structure. How can theories of discourse
  structure (e.g. Rhetorical Structure Theory) be enhanced to
  cover types of discourse that combine natural language/speech
  and other media?
- Media allocation. How does the system decide what combination
  of media is used for expressing a given item of information,
  and how can authors be allowed to influence such decisions?
- Interlinguality. For example, what types of semantic formalism
  are most suitable for expressing the meanings of expressions
  that use different media (e.g., pictures as well as text)?
- `Fusion' of information from different media. For example,
  how can the referring expressions generated by a Multimedia
  Presentation System be simplified if the system is able to
  use pointing?
- Cross-media coreference, deixis, and anaphora. For example,
  when are expressions like `the method illustrated in figure 5'
  felicitous, and how can a system be enabled to generate
  such expressions?
- Media layout (in the case of a written document) and
  media synchronization (e.g., in the case of a presentation
  by a life-like agent).
- Corpora. Multimedia corpora are an obvious potential source of
  information for multimedia generation, but how can connections
  between different media be captured? (E.g., how should pictures,
  graphs, or gestures be annotated?)
- System architecture. For example, can the requirements of
  generating coherent multimedia be reconciled with the
  advantages of a pipeline architecture (e.g. Reiter 1994,
  McKeown et al. 1992)?
- Evaluation of the quality (e.g. coherence) of documents
  or presentations generated by a Multimedia Presentation
  System.

Presentations containing live demonstrations are welcome, but there is
also room for purely theoretical contributions. Each presentation will
be followed by a comment from one of the other participants, who will
have been enabled to see the final version of the paper beforehand.
Submissions format: Submissions (deadline: 31 March) have a preferred
length of about 5 double-spaced pages (not counting title page,
abstract, and references). See the INLG main conference page
(http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~nlg2000/) for details about the use of Latex
(preferred) or Word.  The deadline for camera-ready final versions is
4 May.  Authors are asked to indicate explicitly in their submission
any special requirements that they may have (e.g. use of VCR, internet
access, data projector) beyond an overhead projector.

                        References:

- AIR (1995). Special Issue "Integration of Natural Language
  and Vision Processing: Intelligent Multimedia". Artif.
  Intell. Review 9, Nos.2-3.
- Bordegoni et al (1997). Bordegoni, Faconti, Feiner, Maybury,
  Rist, Ruggieri, Trahanias, and Wilson (1997): A Standard
  Reference Model for Intelligent Multimedia Presentation
  Systems. Computer Standards and Interfaces 18, pp.477-496.
- ETAI (1997, 1998). ETAI News Journal on Intelligent User
  Interfaces, Vol 1, No's 1 and 2. See especially <http://
  www.dfki.de/etai/statements/reiter-nov-97-responses.html>.
- Maybury and Wahlster (1998). Readings in Intelligent User
  Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
- McKeown et al. (1992). McKeown, Feiner, Robin, Seligman,
  Tanenblatt. Generating Cross-references for Multimedia
  Explanation. In Procs. of Tenth National Conf. on Artif.
  Intell., p.9-16. Menlo Park.
- Reiter (1994). Has a Consensus NL Generation Architecture
  Appeared, and is it Psycholinguistically Plausible? In Proc.
  of 7th Int. Generation Ws. Kennebunkport, Maine.

List of organizers (in alphabetical order)

    Elisabeth Andre (Saarbruecken)
    John Lee (Co-chair, Edinburgh)
    James Lester (Raleigh, NC)
    Johanna Moore (Edinburgh)
    Jon Oberlander (Edinburgh)
    Ivandre Paraboni (Brighton)
    Ehud Reiter (Aberdeen)
    Thomas Rist (Saarbruecken)
    Laurent Romary (Loria)
    Donia Scott (Brighton)
    Kees van Deemter (Co-chair, Brighton)

Contact for questions: <Kees.van.Deemter at itri.brighton.ac.uk>

Submission addresses: Submissions should be sent to *both* of
the co-chairs:

     <john at cogsci.ed.ac.uk>                 (John Lee)
     <Kees.van.Deemter at itri.brighton.ac.uk> (Kees van Deemter)

   Please say "INLG Multimedia ws submission" in the subject line
   of your message.

Deadlines:

Submissions due by 31 March
Acceptance/rejection notices sent by 21 April
Camera-ready papers due by 4 May

--
Michael Elhadad
http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~elhadad
Dept of Computer Science, Ben Gurion University
Beer Sheva, Israel