Corpora: Re: 11.11, Calls: Information Retrieval, Syntax & Pragmatics
Svetlana Sheremetyeva
lana at crl.nmsu.edu
Tue May 2 21:33:25 UTC 2000
>
> CALL FOR PARTICIPATION
>
> Analysis for Generation
>
> a Workshop
>
> in conjunction with
>
> The International Conference on Natural
> Language Generation INLG'2000 (June 13-14)
>
> June 12, 2000, Mitzpe Ramon,
> Israel
>
> 1. The reasons why the workshop is of interest at this time.
>
> The last decade has seen an explosion in the work done in the field of NLG with the
> emphasis on the development of independent NLG applications rather than generation
> modules of MT systems. While it seems natural to consider problems of
> analysis and generation as two sides of a coin in such NLP applications as MT,
> researchers working on "pure" generation systems sometimes treat problems arising
> at every stage of generationcontent specification, sentence planning, and
> surface realizationas independent. Time may be ripe for examining the mutual
> utility of analysis and generation in greater detail. The impetus is, as can be
> expected, the goal of minimizing system-building efforts in language engineering.
>
> 2. A brief technical description of the issues the workshop will address.
>
> The workshop proposes to address:
>
> issues connected to the needs of analysis in generation systems as well as
>
> issues of interrelation between generation and analysis from the standpoint
> of reusability and adaptability of analysis techniques and tools for generation.
>
> issues of reusability of analysis knowledge and methodology of its
> acquisition for generation.
>
> Analysis as part of generation. A wide range of complex problems which are
> considered to be specific for generationcontent specification, planning, and
> grammaticalizationmay lead one to believe that generation is completely
> independent
> of analysis. Most generators tacitly assume that an intermediate system module can
> use the output of the preceding module as its input without any processing (that
> is, analysis) of this output. This is not, however, the case in practice.
>
> A modicum of analysis is, in fact, an essential part of every generation system.
> The input to generation systems such as raw data in tables, lists, diagrams,
> elements of various databases or even text snippets that are fed into the system
> directly
> by a user still must first be somehow processed, that is, analyzed. The analysis is
> needed to provide both the necessary content and, often, format for the content
> specification (see, for example, Dale 1995, Robin 1994, Kukich 1988, McKeown
> et al. 1994, Bateman and Teich 1995). This problem becomes especially important in
> those applications (including multilingual ones) in which at least some input to
> generation is in textual form (e.g., Sheremetyeva and Nirenburg 1996).
> Many NLG systems often use a variety of analysis techniques. The question arises
> whether it is possible to develop criteria to better choose and integrate analysis
> techniques which could be efficiently applied at different stages of generation.
> Reusability and adaptability of analysis techniques and tools for generation. While
> it is not uncommon to believe that generation and analysis are not reversible, a
> number of contributions over the years have discussed reversibility of analysis
> and generation resources, especially the grammars. Appelt 1987, Barnett and Mani
> 1990 and van Noord 1993, among others, demonstrate how the use of reversible
> grammars may lead to efficient and flexible natural language parsing and
> generation systems. It is worth discussing constraints on reversibility.
>
> Reusability of analysis knowledge and methodology of its acquisition for
> generation. Generation and analysis are closely related in that both processes use
> many similar resources, and often it is less expensive to reorganize an existing
> "analysis" resource (e.g., an analysis lexicon) than to acquire one for generation
> from scratch. (Allgayer et al. 1989, Viegas and Beale 1996, Sheremetyeva and
> Nirenburg 1999a, 1999b). It is worth discussing how to establish whether a resource
> built for analysis can be used for generation and at what price.
>
>
> THE PROGRAM:
> June,12, 00
>
> 13.00 - 13.15 S. Sheremetyeva. Introduction
>
> 13.15-13.50 H. Manuelian. Reusability of Mental Representation Theory in
> Automatic Generation: Generating Expressions Referring to
> Objects with G-TAG and RMs
>
> 13.50-14.25 D. Lonsdale. Leveraging Analysis Operators in Incremental
> Generation
>
> 14.25-15.00 S. Busemann. Interfacing Constraint-Based Grammars and
> Generation Algorithms
>
> 15.00-15.20 Break
>
> 15.20-17.00 Panel : R. Kempson, S. Nirenburg, M.Zock, S.Sheremetyeva.
>
> PLEASE FIND DETAILS ABOUT REGISTRATION AND ACCOMMODATION at the main conference
> homepage at
>
> http://www.cs.bgu.il/~nlg2000
>
> .Organizing Committee
>
> Svetlana Sheremetyeva, Chair and contact person
> Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, USA
> lana at crl.nmsu.edu
>
> Sergei Nirenburg
> Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, USA
> sergei at crl.nmsu.edu
>
> Richard Kittredge
> Department of Linguistics and Translation, University of Montreal
> kittredge at IRO.UMontreal.CA
>
> Anna Sagvall Hein
> Department of linguistics, Uppsala University
> Anna at ling.uu.se
> Evelyne Viegas
> Microsoft Corporation
> evelynev at microsoft.com
>
> Michael Zock
> Language & Cognition LIMSI - CNRS
> zock at limsi.fr
More information about the Corpora
mailing list