[Corpora-List] BE, HAVE, and DO

[Ronald P. Reck]

I would venture that this cannot be proved because "we" is ambiguous.
Aren't there two interpretations:

1. there is no person such that my baby and I both love that person.

2a.  I do not love anyone besides my baby.
2b.  My baby does not love anyone besides me.

I guess I would say it can be proved if there is only the #2 
interpretations and 'no other' means:

1. my baby loves no one besides themself.
2. I love no one besides myself.


On 02/23/2011 07:34 AM, John F. Sowa wrote:
> On 2/22/2011 3:56 PM, coffey at cli.unipi.it wrote:
>> Another great song phrase with the verb BE is that old
>> classic "is you is, or is you ain't my baby?"
>
> Let's insert some logic into this silly season.
>
> Given the axioms:
>
> I love my baby, my baby loves me.
> We love no other, my baby and me.
>
> Prove:
>
> I am my baby.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Corpora mailing list
> Corpora at uib.no
> http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora

_______________________________________________
Corpora mailing list
Corpora at uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora