[Corpora-List] Language complexity for textual processing
Taras
taras8055 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 26 11:41:31 UTC 2012
Hi Alon
Thank you for the link to the paper.
As for the kind of processing, I meant the usual NLP set: lemmatising,
stemming, POS, probably dependency parsing. I am also interested in
applicability of ML and simple rule-based processing to different
languages and requirements for preprocessing before above-mentioned
techniques could be applied. Nothing too 'fancy'.
Taras
On 26/01/12 11:10, Alon Lischinsky wrote:
> Hi Taras,
>
>> I wonder if anyone knows a research on language complexity evaluation
>> regarding textual processing?
> In the last CSLP there was an interesting presentation by Philip
> Blache, "Evaluating Language Complexity in Context: New Parameters for
> a Constraint-Based Model". It doesn't provide a ranking, but explains
> the rationale for a reasonably sophisticated metric of complexity that
> can hold across different contexts. You can find it in the online
> proceedings at http://control.ruc.dk/CSLP2011/temp/CSLP2011Proceedings.pdf
>
>> Intuitively, I can, for example, assume
>> that English is easier for text processing than French because the
>> latter is more inflected than English which would require more complex
>> lemmatisation.
> It all depends on what kind of processing you're interested in.
> Anything involving the semantics, let alone the pragmatics, of natural
> language in context is so far beyond our ability to process it that
> measuring its complexity seems a pointless exercise.
>
> Cheers,
>
> A.
>
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
> Corpora mailing list
> Corpora at uib.no
> http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora at uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
More information about the Corpora
mailing list