From Gulf to Gulf

Mon Sep 5 18:16:30 UTC 2005

And there's more on the looting/finding photos: An article in today's New York Times. In the business pages (!) http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/business/05caption.html
Should we start a rapid-discourse-analysis-reaction force to get in there first with op-ed articles?! Have (dr/prof) title, will publish (in mainstream media). 
Flyss

The New York Times, September 5, 2005 Monday C6.
Who's a Looter? In Storm's Aftermath, Pictures Kick Up a Different Kind of Tempest by TANIA RALLI

Two news photographs ricocheted through the Internet last week and set off a debate about race and the news media in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
The first photo, taken by Dave Martin, an Associated Press photographer in New Orleans, shows a young black man wading through water that has risen to his chest. He is clutching a case of soda and pulling a floating bag. The caption provided by The A.P. says he has just been ''looting a grocery store.'' 
The second photo, also from New Orleans, was taken by Chris Graythen for Getty Images and distributed by Agence France-Presse. It shows a white couple up to their chests in the same murky water. The woman is holding some bags of food. This caption says they are shown ''after finding bread and soda from a local grocery store.''
Both photos turned up Tuesday on Yahoo News, which posts automatic feeds of articles and photos from wire services. Soon after, a user of the photo-sharing site Flickr juxtaposed the images and captions on a single page, which attracted links from many blogs. The left-leaning blog Daily Kos linked to the page with the comment, ''It's not looting if you're white.''
The contrast of the two photo captions, which to many indicated a double standard at work, generated widespread anger toward the news media that quickly spread beyond the Web. 
On Friday night, the rapper Kanye West ignored the teleprompter during NBC's live broadcast of ''A Concert for Hurricane Relief,'' using the opportunity to lambaste President Bush and criticize the press. ''I hate the way they portray us in the media,'' he said. ''You see a black family, it says they're looting. You see a white family, it says they're looking for food.'' 
Many bloggers were quick to point out that the photos came from two different agencies, and so could not reflect the prejudice of a single media outlet. A writer on the blog BoingBoing wrote: ''Perhaps there's more factual substantiation behind each copywriter's choice of words than we know. But to some, the difference in tone suggests racial bias, implicit or otherwise.''
According to the agencies, each photographer captioned his own photograph. Jack Stokes, a spokesman for The A.P., said that photographers are told to describe what they have seen when they write a caption.
Mr. Stokes said The A.P. had guidelines in place before Hurricane Katrina struck to distinguish between ''looting'' and ''carrying.'' If a photographer sees a person enter a business and emerge with goods, it is described as looting. Otherwise The A.P. calls it carrying.
Mr. Stokes said that Mr. Martin had seen the man in his photograph wade into a grocery store and come out with the sodas and bag, so by A.P.'s definition, the man had looted.
The photographer for Getty Images, Mr. Graythen, said in an e-mail message that he had also stuck to what he had seen to write his caption, and had actually given the wording a great deal of thought. Mr. Graythen described seeing the couple near a corner store from an elevated expressway. The door to the shop was open, and things had floated out to the street. He was not able to talk to the couple, ''so I had to draw my own conclusions,'' he said. 
In the extreme conditions of New Orleans, Mr. Graythen said, taking necessities like food and water to survive could not be considered stealing. He said that had he seen people coming out of stores with computers and DVD players, he would have considered that looting.
''If you're taking something that runs solely from a wall outlet that requires power from the electric company -- when we are not going to have power for weeks, even months -- that's inexcusable,'' he said. 
Since the photo was published last Tuesday Mr. Graythen has received more than 500 e-mail messages, most of them supportive, he said. 
Within three hours of the photo's publication online, editors at Agence France-Presse rewrote Mr. Graythen's caption. But the original caption remained online as part of a Yahoo News slide show. Under pressure to keep up with the news, and lacking the time for a discussion about word choice, Olivier Calas, the agency's director of multimedia, asked Yahoo to remove the photo last Thursday. 
Now, in its place, when readers seek the picture of the couple, a statement from Neil Budde, the general manager of Yahoo News, appears in its place. The statement emphasizes that Yahoo News did not write the photo captions and that it did not edit the captions, so that the photos can be made available as quickly as possible.
Mr. Calas said Agence France-Presse was bombarded with e-mail messages complaining about the caption. He said the caption was unclear and should have been reworded earlier. ''This was a consequence of a series of negligences, not ill intent,'' he said.
For Mr. Graythen, whose parents and grandparents lost their homes in the disaster, the fate of the survivors was the most important thing. In his e-mail message he wrote: ''Now is no time to pass judgment on those trying to stay alive. Now is no time to argue semantics about finding versus looting. Now is no time to argue if this is a white versus black issue.''

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/discours/attachments/20050905/a98d1d97/attachment.htm>