[EDLING:2176] CFP: Kant revisited: Testing
Tamara Warhol
warholt at DOLPHIN.UPENN.EDU
Tue Dec 12 16:30:35 UTC 2006
Full Title: Kant revisited: Testing
Date: 24-Aug-2008 - 29-Aug-2008
Location: Essen, Germany
Contact Person: Una Dirks
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://www.uni-hildesheim.de/~dirks/Texte/Dirks-AILA2008.pdf
Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics; Language Acquisition;
Psycholinguistics
Call Deadline: 15-Jan-2008
Meeting Description:
AILA 2008, thematic strand 'Language Evaluation, Assessment and Testing'
Full title: Immanuel Kant revisited: testing the output and outcomes of
L1,2,n reading/ written/visual literacy or discourse competencies.
This symposion aims at the presentation of a wide array of assessment
and evaluation measures with regard to reading, written and/or visual
literacy and discourse competencies in different institutionalised and
non-institutionalised domains (e.g. school, vocational training,
professional fields like business, journalism/media, any other
biographically relevant learning context) from a clear-cut educational
perspective.
Nowadays, formative or summative assessment and evaluation have become
well-established measures to meet the demands of accountability in
education systems and in all kinds of professional fields. For example,
the PISA-Consortium has made great efforts to develop test concepts and
items on the background of a functional approach of education. However,
this approach and its operationalisation by specific proficiency scales
and levels could be improved or even substituted, if there were more
elaborated theoretical heuristics and empirical results at hand being
committed to testing the educational output and/or, if possible, the
educational outcomes.
Researchers from text-, pragma- and sociolinguistics, as well as from
applied, cognitive or educational linguistics are invited to put their
empirically tested concepts to the fore (e.g. portfolio, semi-structural
interviews on learning biographies, assessment dialogues, oral
proficiency interviews, tests of second language pragmatics, Discourse
Complementary Tests, Information Gap Tasks in interaction, Cloze-tests,
test constructs on the basis of the Item Response Theory) and to discuss
the achieved competencies in terms of their educational impact to be
identified as a specific output or as somehow measurable outcomes. In
this context, we would appreciate a discussion on im-/possibilities of
controling presage and process variables that are supposed to have an
impact on the learning effects (output, outcomes).
For more information, particularly concerning the educational concept,
please visit the following links:
http://www.uni-hildesheim.de/~dirks/Texte/Dirks-AILA2008.pdf or
http://www.zhwin.ch/departement-l/download-l/sfe/Dirks-Werlen_AILA2008.pdf.
Speakers will have 20 minutes for presentation and 10 minutes for
discussion.
Submissions:
We invite proposals on all topics related to the meeting description.
Papers are particulary welcome, if they provide details on the knowledge
base of the output and outcomes in non-/ institutionalised learning
contexts, for example, bearing on subject-, discipline-, profession-
and/or gender-specific language-related knowledge features. Apart from
that the chosen genre formats of the applied test items should be taken
into account. An open question we would like to discuss with all
participants of our session refers to chances and constraints of
testing, if we would not conceive the target language as homogenised.
The AILA will only accept papers that include original research (e.g.
the new research focus on differing between output and outcomes) and
have not yet been published elsewhere.
Submission format:
Proposals (max. 500-700 words) should be written in English or German
and forwarded to the conveners by email as doc or pdf files. The
following details should be included:
Name(s) of presenter(s), affiliation, email address(es),
The research question and competencies to be assessed/evaluated,
The data sample or corpus,
Methods of data sampling and analysis,
Methodology (e.g. criteria of good research like construct validity,
which model of competencies),
Educational framework, if possible,
Research results.
It is previewed to publish the accepted papers in a separate volume.
For presenters from overseas or other European countries we will try to
provide an extra funding.
If you have any questions don't hesitate to contact the conveners Prof.
Dr. Una Dirks (dirksuni-hildesheim.de) or Prof. Dr. Erika Werlen
(erika.werlenzhwin.ch)
More information about the Edling
mailing list