[EDLING:1379] Multicultural education for the disadvantaged
Francis M. Hult
fmhult at DOLPHIN.UPENN.EDU
Sun Mar 26 19:24:41 UTC 2006
The Jakarta Post
http://www.thejakartapost.com/detaileditorial.asp?fileid=20060325.E02&irec=2
Multicultural education for the disadvantaged
Setiono Sugiharto, Jakarta
Indonesian schools contain a pretty heterogeneous mix of students, coming from
a wide variety of cultures, ethnic backgrounds and races. With this
heterogeneity, they are assumed to have different cognitive and affective
factors, self-esteem, curiosity, language facility and motivation for
achievement.
It is those who come from minority cultures and languages that are often put
at a disadvantage. Arguably, the imposition of a uniform language and culture,
personal peculiarities, and the ideology of underlying political motives is no
longer germane in this post-modernist era. With this in mind, developing
multicultural educational programs for those who are disadvantaged culturally
is imperative.
It is often the case that culturally disadvantaged children are blamed for the
peculiarities and irregularities that they bring to the classroom. For
example, in a language class, teachers feel irritated with learners (coming
from certain cultural backgrounds like Javanese and Sundanese) who
mispronounce English words, use incorrect grammatical elements when speaking
and are disorganized in their writing.
This being the case, teachers erroneously develop the attitude that the
phonological and grammatical errors produced by the students are the result of
their cognitive deficiencies, at best, or a reflection of inadequate cognitive
development, at worst. This attitude disadvantages learners in experiencing
the new language they are learning.
A learner's erroneous use of language, which is often heavily influenced by
his language and culture, is often assumed to be a sign of the impairment of
his cognitive development. The crux of this point of view is that the new
language (target language) being learned is different from the learner's
native language, which must be inferior to the target language, and since
language is essential to cognition, an inferior language must impair the
cognitive development of those of speak it. This is, of course, a fallacious
assumption.
Interference is a natural phenomenon in language learning that refers to one
language interfering with another language. That is, when a learner attempts
to learn another language, his native language imposes on the language he is
learning. The same phenomenon occurs when a speaker of one dialect attempts to
learn another dialect of the same language.
Now, it is likely that the cognitive needs of learners from different cultures
are considerably different. Clearly, the errors produced by those learning
English, for example, can be a reflection of the way they use their own
language, not a sign of inadequate cognitive development. The point is,
difference does not equal cognitive impairment.
It is time to introduce what is called multicultural education, a type of
education program that attempts to compensate for the lack of understanding
between two learners coming from different cultural backgrounds.
The urge to promote multicultural education in the country should be taken as
a manifestation or realization of the national education curriculum, the
objective of which is to respect diverse cultural identities, traditions and
pluralism.
The categories of multicultural education programs can take many forms.
First, programs to provide supplementary experience based on the assumption
that differences between culturally disadvantaged children and middle-class
children are matters of degree.
Second, programs to provide academic preparatory experience based on the
assumption that what culturally deprived children mainly lack is familiarity
with the academic activities surrounding them.
Third, programs to provide compensatory experience sufficient to modify
environmental effects based on the assumption that culturally deprived
children differ fundamentally from middle-class children in self-concept,
language, values and perceptual processes.
The programs are of a great benefit and can help disadvantaged children learn
to know themselves through real-life activities surrounding them, develop a
positive self-image, develop problem-solving and concept-formation ability,
and enhance the development of language skills. Maybe we must learn from the
Western education model that applies these kind of multicultural education
programs.
The success of applying these program was proved by the Speech Improvement
Project of the Curriculum Office of the Philadelphia Board of Education in the
U.S. Applying the programs at all levels of Philadelphia's inner-city schools,
this project undertook a careful review of curriculum materials covering
speech activities or oral language development and learning for the
disadvantaged.
Using the curriculum formulated by the curriculum and special education
offices, the Philadelphia Board of Education incorporated several phases or
approaches to speech improvement in elementary grades, such as the technique
of teaching choral speaking to elementary school personnel, presenting a
speech program for the early elementary grades, developing lesson plans,
training teachers and appointing teachers of English as a second language for
children who spoke little or no English.
The employment of this approach indeed yielded a satisfactory result after
three years of testing and modification by the Philadelphia schools. Since
then it has served as a model program for other school systems, and has
enabled the program to be a strong leader in the field of language arts
curriculum for the culturally disadvantaged.
Due to its effectiveness in assisting the culturally disadvantaged in the
Philadelphia schools, it is worth trying this multicultural language program
here.
The writer is a lecturer in the School of Education at Atma Jaya University in
Jakarta. His published works can be viewed at
http://www.geocities.com/eltindonesia/whoiswho.html.
More information about the Edling
mailing list