[Edling] Urgent question from bilingual teacher

[Miriam E Ebsworth]

Dear Peter,

Thank you for your thoughts and for taking the time and trouble to share
them.

I'll forward them to the teacher.

Sincerely,
Miriam

Miriam Eisenstein Ebsworth, PhD
Dir. of PhD & Post-MA Programs in Multilingual Multicultural Studies
NYU Steinhardt,
316 East Building
New York, NY 10003

Research Editor: Journal of Writing and Pedagogy
Chair, NABE Research SIG Advisory Board
Co-chair, ELL Think Tank

office phone: (212) 998-5195
office fax: (212) 995-3636




On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Peter Sayer <peter.sayer at utsa.edu> wrote:

> Ofelia Garcia’s (2009) *Bilingual Education in the 21 Century* is a good
> comprehensive text and has a clear explanation of translanguaging, though
> as Anne Marie mentions the concept is being used in many ways recently, and
> also harkens back to earlier bilingual approaches to bilingual ed such as
> Jacobson’s (1980s) “New Concurrent” approach which advocated the teacher’s
> use of purposeful and strategic language mixing.
>
> About the positioning of above-below vs. side-to-side: I’m not aware of
> any work on this specific aspect of language positioning, but would say
> from a (1) linguistic perspective, it makes good sense to put a particular
> sentence in one language above another so that students can more clearly
> see how syntactic and lexical elements line up.  However, from a (2)
> language valorization perspective, the problem the observer may have had
> was not above-below per se, but rather that English was positioned ABOVE
> Spanish, which may be seen as implicitly reinforcing the subordinate
> position of the minoritized language.  In that case, positioning the
> languages side by side represents them on more equal footing (or even use
> above/below, but put Spanish on top).  Or maybe the observer was just being
> cranky… but kudos to the teacher for taking the critique seriously and
> following up.
>
> - peter.-
>
> From: <edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se> on behalf of anne marie devlin <
> anne_mariedevlin at hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: The Educational Linguistics List <edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
> Date: Monday, April 18, 2016 at 9:04 AM
> To: The Educational Linguistics List <edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
> Subject: Re: [Edling] Urgent question from bilingual teacher
>
> Miriam
>
> Current research is coming out strongly in favour of 'translanguaging'
> where code switching is seen as a benefit to learners rather than a sign of
> lack of acquisition.
> I'm not at my desk and don't have access to references at the moment, but
> a google search should bring up some interesting findings to support your
> colleagues approach.
>
> Hope that helps
>
> Anne Marie
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:29:35 -0500
> From: mee1 at nyu.edu
> To: francis.hult at englund.lu.se; edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
> Subject: [Edling] Urgent question from bilingual teacher
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> A grad of one of our programs is a bilingual (Spanish) social studies
> teacher in New York City, with 11 years of teaching experience.
>
> The teacher received a super-critical review of a class observation from
> somebody outside the school who observed a single lesson. The observer knew
> nothing in advance about the teacher's curriculum or approach; there had
> been no communication with the teacher in advance of the observation.
> After having written a scathing observation report, the observer refused to
> have a conversation with the teacher, who sought politely to explain their
> perspective and try to understand better the nature of the critique.
>
> The teacher has requested input on one issue in particular:
> At the top of the lesson, the teacher had written a guiding question in
> English with the Spanish version directly underneath.
>
> The teacher, as I understand it, sought to have the students first try to
> understand the text in English, then read it in Spanish, and using all
> linguistic resources make meaning out of the question. (And ultimately, the
> students will be tested in English.)
>
> One of the many criticisms in the observation report was that the English
> and Spanish versions should have appeared side by side rather than one
> above the other. The teacher is perplexed.
>
> While the teacher's explanation makes sense to me, I have been asked
> whether there is any objective guidance available from the research on best
> practices to advocate for EITHER of the 2 approaches (2 languages side by
> side versus one above the other).
>
> Thank you in advance for sharing your perspective. I'll pass it on.
>
> Sincerely,
> Miriam
>
> Miriam Eisenstein Ebsworth, PhD
> Dir. of PhD & Post-MA Programs in Multilingual Multicultural Studies
> NYU Steinhardt,
> 316 East Building
> New York, NY 10003
>
> Research Editor: Journal of Writing and Pedagogy
> Chair, NABE Research SIG Advisory Board
> Co-chair, ELL Think Tank
>
> office phone: (212) 998-5195
> office fax: (212) 995-3636
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Edling mailing list
> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
>
> _______________________________________________
> Edling mailing list
> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/edling/attachments/20160418/a052e165/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Edling mailing list
Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling