No subject
Thu Mar 25 22:55:57 UTC 1999
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path:
<owner-endangered-languages-l at carmen.murdoch.edu.au>
X-Authentication-Warning: carmen.murdoch.edu.au: majodomo set
sender to owner-endangered-languages-l at carmen.murdoch.edu.au
using -f
From: "David Harris" <dharris at las-inc.com>
To: <endangered-languages-l at carmen.murdoch.edu.au>
Subject: ELL: Observation regarding two recent threads
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:55:57 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-endangered-languages-l at carmen.murdoch.edu.au
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: endangered-languages-l at carmen.murdoch.edu.au
I just wanted to make a brief observation regarding two recent
threads. One
thread involved Transparent Language Systems, a
computerized-language-tutorial producer who has evidently
expressed interest
in creating template programs which could be used for promoting
the learning
of endangered languages by making it easy for anyone to produce
computerized
materials for any language. The other involves accusations made
by a list
member (Matthew McDonald) against an American Baptist
missionary.
What surprised me was how quick many list members were to jump
on TLS for
making this offer, simply assuming that, as a business, they
must be out to
make money off the situation and, therefore, didn't really care
about
endangered languages. In contrast, only one other list member
expressed
sympathy for Matthew McDonald's position which, other than his
specific
allegations against a Mr. Lewis, involved general statements of
how
Christian missionaries trample on indigenous rights.
Now I don't know much about this Lewis fellow per se, but it is
a historical
fact that Christian evangelist movements have sought to rot out
indigenous
languages and traditions wherever they have reached. (In some
cases,
ironically enough, one Christian movement may work toward
rotting out
another Christian tradition). Only rarely has a missionary stood
up for what
was right and criticized his/her church for its destructive
policies. So it
seems to me that people sympathetic to the cause of preserving
indigenous
languages, cultures, etc. would have a natural mistrust of
evangelists.
TLS, on the other hand, has developed some very nice products
that are very
effective tools for language learning. Yes, they make money as
everyone of
you list members do unless you're living on the street or on the
dole or out
in the wilderness somewhere and just happen to have a computer
at your
disposal in order to read this mail. Making money is a necessary
evil in
this society.
Obviously, there is much to mistrust about
business. Particularly large and
powerful corporations whose undue influence I fear much more
than that of
"big government." But if it weren't for the endowments which
fund much of
the cost of running the universities where many list members are
affiliated
(which come, almost without exception, from business) or the
taxes (which
come also from business, ultimately), those people would not be
able to be
employed.
Incidentally, I was a missionary in Europe for two years, so I
know a lot
about evangelism. I know that many of its goals are good, but
historically,
it cannot be denied that the Church, whether acting alone or as
a lackey for
political powers, has wreaked a lot of havoc on the world over
the
centuries. I don't think TLS is guilty of any of these offenses.
-David Harris
Washington, DC
----
Endangered-Languages-L Forum: endangered-languages-l at carmen.murdoch.edu.au
Web pages http://carmen.murdoch.edu.au/lists/endangered-languages-l/
Subscribe/unsubscribe and other commands: majordomo at carmen.murdoch.edu.au
----
More information about the Endangered-languages-l
mailing list