ELL: RE: Re: indigenous

[cbooth at ES.COM]

Or Navajo and Apache, which apparently didn't arrive in the southwest of the
United States until after Spanish did.
Curtis


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tasaku Tsunoda [mailto:tsunoda at tooyoo.l.u-tokyo.ac.jp]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 20, 2001 6:27 PM
To:	endangered-languages-l at cleo.murdoch.edu.au
Subject:	ELL: Re: indigenous

At 4:14 PM -0700 01.6.20, Victor Golla wrote:
>6/20/2001
>
>
>
>If we linguists were as sensitive to language use as we are
>to structure, we would probably long since have replaced
>"indigenous" with "pre-European expansion", which is what we
>usually really mean.  Guarani and Cherokee are certainly that,
>whatever the blood quantum of their speakers or the sacredness
>of the soil they are spoken on.
>


    I think the term 'pre-European expansion' is not sufficient. Consider,
for example, the Ainu language of Japan.

Tasaku Tsunoda
--

Tasaku Tsunoda
Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology
University of Tokyo
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan

Phone:  +81-3-5841-3790
Fax:     +81-3-5803-2784
----
Endangered-Languages-L Forum: endangered-languages-l at cleo.murdoch.edu.au
Web pages http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/lists/endangered-languages-l/
Subscribe/unsubscribe and other commands: majordomo at cleo.murdoch.edu.au
----
----
Endangered-Languages-L Forum: endangered-languages-l at cleo.murdoch.edu.au
Web pages http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/lists/endangered-languages-l/
Subscribe/unsubscribe and other commands: majordomo at cleo.murdoch.edu.au
----