E-Prime 2.0 cloning, feature comparison

[David K McFarlane]

Tony, 


> Also, What are the extra features of the Pro version that are alluded
> to? Are they really needed in a teaching environment where very little
> interfacing is done and most of the time only a very few people
> actually create experiments.
 

This has been discussed at some length both on this list and at the PST 
Forum, you might try searching at 
http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/eprime.html or 
http://support.pstnet.com/forum , or try my little essay at 
http://support.pstnet.com/forum/Topic914-13-1.aspx . 


Short answer, in your case I believe the "standard" edition will do fine.  
Almost nobody needs the advanced features of Pro, however there are some 
incompatibilities between experiments saved as Pro vs. standard.  So just to 
allow for the widest compatibility between collaborating researchers, I 
advise all researchers to use Pro, but then to make sure to start writing 
each new experiment with the standard (not Pro) template.  But again, for 
basic classroom use I don't see any advantage to Pro. 


 -- David McFarlane, Professional Faultfinder 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To post to this group, send email to e-prime at googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to e-prime-unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/e-prime?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---