Evidence on e-prime timing accuracy compared to other similar software?

[CB]

On Apr 24, 3:53 am, David McFarlane <mcfar... at msu.edu> wrote:
> At 4/21/2009 04:06 PM Tuesday, CB wrote:
>
> >Here's one comparative review:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16955731
>
>
> Thanks, that's the one I referred to earlier, you
> saved me a lot of trouble!  This 2006 paper by
> Christoph Stahl compares DirectRT, E-Prime,
> Inquisit, and SuperLab (2004).  Here is the
> relevant excerpt from that paper -- note especially the final clause:

It's still largely a matter of assumptions, however (albeit reasonable
ones).

There is some more empirical stuff in the heacademy page I linked to,
but I haven't yet had time to read and digest properly.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To post to this group, send email to e-prime at googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to e-prime+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/e-prime?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---