Wisconsin card sorting test
David McFarlane
mcfarla9 at msu.edu
Tue Aug 31 21:27:26 UTC 2010
For those of you who might not read beyond the first line: I will
write a professional quality WCST in EP for no charge, if I can only
get a bit of help. Read on if interested...
Well, despite the reservations I expressed earlier, on my own time I
went ahead and threw together a working skeleton in EP for the WCST,
just to flex my E-Prime muscles. The basic control logic is really
quite simple, and with a couple of tricks (e.g., nested attribute
references) the E-Prime design is rather sleek.
I would like to complete this project to my usual professional
standards and then submit it for inclusion in the public STEP library
so that everyone can use it. In short, I aim to make this no less
than a completely faithful computerized replica of the standardized
test, in EP. But to do that I will need many more specific details
on the mechanics of the standardized test. E.g., I have been told
that the standardized test presents the "response" cards in the same
pre-ordained sequence for each run, and I need to know that
sequence. Also, if I can get hold of the scoring rules then I might
even have a whack at that, although I think it enough just to have
the program administer the test & record raw data. (It would also be
nice if I could get someone else to do the card graphics, as I am
lousy at graphics -- I would need only 16 image files, not all 64,
since I know how to make EP change the colors.) I should be able to
learn all I need from the official WCST Manual, with perhaps a look
at a printed card deck. But a manual costs $115, and a card deck
$170, more than I care to spend for something that is, for me at
least, only a hobby project.
So here's the deal: If any of you can help me get access to
materials that fully specify the mechanics of the test (ideally the
printed Manual and/or cards) then I will complete this project in
short order and you will all have a professional quality WCST in EP.
-- David McFarlane, Professional Faultfinder
At 8/23/2010 05:24 PM Monday, David McFarlane wrote:
>Well, I toyed with the idea of making a simple WCST in E-Prime just
>to amuse myself. But when I looked into it further, I got puzzled.
>
>The WCST started off with simple printed materials administered
>manually by a human examiner. Clearly the WCST does not require
>millisecond precision. So if we simply want to automate it, why use
>such an expensive, specialized, and heavyweight platform as
>E-Prime? Wouldn't it make more sense to use some more common
>platform such as JavaScript, or Flash, or Python, or even straight
>Visual Basic? Note that the WCST was automated using simple Turbo
>Basic (for DOS?) as far back as 1996. Isn't this another case of,
>"When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a
>nail" Or, insofar as I have not kept up with the literature on the
>WCST, am I just missing something that is obvious to the rest of you?
>
>Also, apparently scoring the test is quite complex (perseverative
>errors, nonperseverative errors, etc.), so building that into the
>program (as opposed to leaving that to later data analysis) would
>take some care.
>
>Finally, did anyone else know that the term "Wisconsin Card Sorting
>Test" was trademarked by Wells Printing and Digital Services of
>Madison, Wisconsin, USA (see
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_card_sort )? So we cannot
>give the name "Wisconsin Card Sorting Test" to any printed materials
>that we produce, but since the trademark does not cover computerized
>versions we may continue to use the name "Wisconsin Card Sorting
>Test" for our computerized versions.
>
>With all that said, note that someone did make an automated WCST
>demo for Inquisit's Millisecond
>(http://www.millisecond.com/download/samples/v3/CardSort ), though I
>do not know what data it stores or how it handles the test scoring.
>
>-- David McFarlane, Professional Faultfinder
>
>
>At 8/20/2010 12:10 PM Friday, David McFarlane wrote:
>>As far as I can tell no one has made an E-Prime WCST available on
>>the Web. It would be quite interesting to make one. As I recall,
>>in essence the task involves operantly rewarding the subject for
>>correctly following an undisclosed rule, changing the rule whenever
>>the subject achieves an overall success criterion, and seeing how
>>well the subject can adapt to the changing rules. This would
>>require some interesting code in E-Prime, in particular scoring the
>>success rate and then changing the "correct" rule on the fly, but
>>it could be done. Wish I had the liberty to do it myself.
>>
>>-- David McFarlane, Professional Faultfinder
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To post to this group, send email to e-prime at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to e-prime+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/e-prime?hl=en.
More information about the Eprime
mailing list